• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体-基台界面处的细菌渗漏:培养和 DNA checkerboard 杂交分析。

Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface: culture and DNA Checkerboard hybridization analyses.

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1168-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02280.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02280.x
PMID:22092990
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bacterial species have been found harboring the internal surface of dental implants as consequence of their failed connections. The aim of the present study was to compare the detection frequency of bacterial leakage from human saliva through the implant-abutment interface, under non-loading conditions, using either DNA Checkerboard or culture method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty dental implants with hexagonal platforms were connected to pre-machined abutments according to the manufacturers' specifications. The assemblies were individually incubated in human saliva under anaerobic conditions for 7 days at 37°C. Afterward, contents from the inner parts of the implants were collected and evaluated with either DNA Checkerboard (s = 15) or culture (n = 15). Subsequently, identification and quantitation of bacterial species from saliva and implants were carried out for the group evaluated with the DNA Checkerboard method.

RESULTS

Both DNA Checkerboard and culture showed positive signals of bacterial leakage in 6 of the 15 evaluated samples. Capnocytophaga gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans were the most frequently detected species harboring the internal surface of the implants followed by Veillonella parvula.

CONCLUSION

Occurrence of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface is comparably detected with both DNA Checkerboard hybridization and conventional culture methods.

摘要

目的

由于连接失败,细菌物种已被发现存在于牙种植体的内表面。本研究旨在比较在非加载条件下,使用 DNA checkerboard 或培养方法,从人唾液中检测细菌通过种植体-基台界面泄漏的频率。

材料和方法

将 30 个具有六方平台的牙种植体按照制造商的规格连接到预加工的基台上。将组件分别在 37°C 下的厌氧条件下在人唾液中孵育 7 天。之后,从种植体内部收集内容物,并使用 DNA checkerboard(s=15)或培养法(n=15)进行评估。随后,对使用 DNA checkerboard 方法评估的组进行唾液和种植体中细菌种类的鉴定和定量。

结果

DNA checkerboard 和培养法均在 15 个评估样本中的 6 个样本中显示出细菌泄漏的阳性信号。牙龈二氧化碳嗜纤维菌和变形链球菌是最常检测到的存在于种植体内部表面的物种,其次是小韦荣球菌。

结论

在种植体-基台界面处发生细菌泄漏的情况,使用 DNA checkerboard 杂交和传统培养方法均可检测到。

相似文献

1
Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface: culture and DNA Checkerboard hybridization analyses.种植体-基台界面处的细菌渗漏:培养和 DNA checkerboard 杂交分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1168-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02280.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
2
Use of checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization to evaluate the internal contamination of dental implants and comparison of bacterial leakage with cast or pre-machined abutments.使用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交技术评估牙科植入物的内部污染情况,并比较铸造或预加工基台的细菌渗漏情况。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):571-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01663.x. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
3
In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of an external-hex implant after saliva incubation.唾液孵育后体外评估外六角种植体-基台界面的细菌渗漏情况。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):782-7.
4
Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions.种植体-基台界面的唾液渗漏:三种不同种植体连接在非负重和负重条件下的体外评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):551-60.
5
Bacterial culture and DNA Checkerboard for the detection of internal contamination in dental implants.用于检测牙种植体内部污染的细菌培养和DNA棋盘法。
J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul;18(5):376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00454.x. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
6
Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.反复拧紧螺钉对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Dec;20(12):1394-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01769.x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
7
The peri-implant sulcus compared with internal implant and suprastructure components: a microbiological analysis.种植体周围龈沟与种植体内部及上部结构部件的比较:微生物分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Dec;13(4):286-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00220.x. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
8
Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of premachined or cast components.沿预加工或铸造部件的种植体-基台界面的细菌渗漏。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Feb;37(2):177-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.026. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
9
Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro.体外研究莫氏锥度种植体-基台界面处微生物渗漏
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):328-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01837.x. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
10
Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.骨水泥固位与螺丝固位种植体-基台连接内部的液体和微生物渗透情况。
J Periodontol. 2001 Sep;72(9):1146-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1146.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the microgap and sealing capability in four implant systems with different interlockings under different tightening torques: an study.评估四种具有不同互锁结构的种植体系统在不同拧紧扭矩下的微间隙和封闭能力:一项研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Dec;16(6):336-347. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.6.336. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Evaluation of sealing efficacy and removal convenience of sealing materials for implant abutment screw access holes.评价种植体基台螺丝孔封闭材料的密封效果和去除便利性。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02403-y.
3
One-Piece Titanium Implants: Retrospective Case Series.
一体式钛植入物:回顾性病例系列
Case Rep Dent. 2021 Apr 8;2021:6688355. doi: 10.1155/2021/6688355. eCollection 2021.
4
Biological Oriented Immediate Loading: A New Mathematical Implant Vertical Insertion Protocol, Five-Year Follow-Up Study.生物导向即刻负重:一种新的种植体垂直植入数学方案,五年随访研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;14(2):387. doi: 10.3390/ma14020387.
5
biofilm formation on different titanium surface topographies.不同钛表面形貌上的生物膜形成
Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Oct 9;7(1):146-157. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1829489.
6
Sealing agent reduces formation of single and dual-species biofilms of Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis on screw joints at the abutment/implant interface.封口剂减少了在基台/种植体界面的螺丝连接处白色念珠菌和粪肠球菌的单种和双种生物膜的形成。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 22;14(10):e0223148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223148. eCollection 2019.
7
Bone Loss in Implants Placed at Subcrestal and Crestal Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.种植于牙槽嵴顶以下和牙槽嵴顶水平的种植体骨吸收:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jan 5;12(1):154. doi: 10.3390/ma12010154.
8
Oral bacterial colonization on dental implants restored with titanium or zirconia abutments: 6-month follow-up.钛或氧化锆基台修复的牙种植体表面口腔细菌定植:6 个月随访。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2335-2343. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2334-0. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
9
Microleakage at the Different Implant Abutment Interface: A Systematic Review.不同种植体基台界面的微渗漏:一项系统评价
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZE10-ZE15. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28951.10054. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: A prospective comparative study.种植体嵴顶和嵴下植入对种植体周围骨组织的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jan 1;21(1):e103-10. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20747.