Suppr超能文献

射血分数和主动脉瓣梯度对经导管主动脉瓣置换术结局的影响

Impact of Ejection Fraction and Aortic Valve Gradient on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Baron Suzanne J, Arnold Suzanne V, Herrmann Howard C, Holmes David R, Szeto Wilson Y, Allen Keith B, Chhatriwalla Adnan K, Vemulapali Sreekaanth, O'Brien Sean, Dai Dadi, Cohen David J

机构信息

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Philadelphia.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 24;67(20):2349-2358. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.514.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), studies have suggested that reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and low aortic valve gradient (AVG) are associated with worse long-term outcomes. Because these conditions commonly coexist, the extent to which they are independently associated with outcomes after TAVR is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of LVEF and AVG on clinical outcomes after TAVR and to determine whether the effect of AVG on outcomes is modified by LVEF.

METHODS

Using data from 11,292 patients who underwent TAVR as part of the Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry, we examined rates of 1-year mortality and recurrent heart failure in patients with varying levels of LV dysfunction (LVEF <30% vs. 30% to 50% vs. >50%) and AVG (<40 mm Hg vs. ≥40 mm Hg). Multivariable models were used to estimate the independent effect of AVG and LVEF on outcomes.

RESULTS

During the first year of follow-up after TAVR, patients with LV dysfunction and low AVG had higher rates of death and recurrent heart failure. After adjustment for other clinical factors, only low AVG was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 1.32; p < 0.001) and higher rates of heart failure (hazard ratio: 1.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.36 to 1.69; p <0.001), whereas the effect of LVEF was no longer significant. There was no evidence of effect modification between AVG and LVEF with respect to either endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of real-world patients undergoing TAVR, low AVG, but not LV dysfunction, was associated with higher rates of mortality and recurrent heart failure. Although these findings suggest that AVG should be considered when evaluating the risks and benefits of TAVR for individual patients, neither severe LV dysfunction nor low AVG alone or in combination provide sufficient prognostic discrimination to preclude treatment with TAVR.

摘要

背景

在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,研究表明左心室(LV)射血分数(LVEF)降低和主动脉瓣梯度(AVG)较低与较差的长期预后相关。由于这些情况通常同时存在,它们与TAVR术后预后独立相关的程度尚不清楚。

目的

本研究的目的是评估LVEF和AVG对TAVR术后临床结局的影响,并确定LVEF是否会改变AVG对结局的影响。

方法

利用来自11292例接受TAVR治疗的患者的数据,这些数据来自经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究,我们检查了不同程度左心室功能障碍(LVEF<30% vs. 30%至50% vs.>50%)和AVG(<40 mmHg vs.≥40 mmHg)患者的1年死亡率和复发性心力衰竭发生率。使用多变量模型来估计AVG和LVEF对结局的独立影响。

结果

在TAVR术后的第一年随访期间,左心室功能障碍和低AVG的患者死亡和复发性心力衰竭的发生率较高。在对其他临床因素进行调整后,只有低AVG与较高的死亡率(风险比:1.21;95%置信区间:1.11至1.32;p<0.001)和较高的心力衰竭发生率(风险比:1.52;95%置信区间:1.36至1.69;p<0.001)相关,而LVEF的影响不再显著。关于任何一个终点,均没有证据表明AVG和LVEF之间存在效应修正。

结论

在这一系列接受TAVR治疗的真实世界患者中,低AVG而非左心室功能障碍与较高的死亡率和复发性心力衰竭发生率相关。尽管这些发现表明在评估TAVR对个体患者的风险和益处时应考虑AVG,但严重的左心室功能障碍或单独或联合的低AVG均不能提供足够的预后判别能力来排除TAVR治疗。

相似文献

1
Impact of Ejection Fraction and Aortic Valve Gradient on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 24;67(20):2349-2358. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.514.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The TOPAS-TAVI Registry.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 27;71(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.054.
4
Impact of flow, gradient, and left ventricular function on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):798-805. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27347. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
5
Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 27;62(9):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and standard therapy in inoperable patients with aortic stenosis and low EF.
Heart. 2015 Mar;101(6):463-71. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306737. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
9
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 12;11(3):301-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.032.
10
Prognostic significance of aortic valve gradient in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1175-1182. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27124. Epub 2017 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-enabled screening for aortic stenosis with handheld ultrasound.
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 May 8;3(1):qyaf051. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf051. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Evolution of Untreated Moderate Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 9;61(4):686. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040686.
4
Outcomes of Worsened Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Jan 27;18:437-445. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S489952. eCollection 2025.
5
Natural History of Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2025 Jul;120(1):41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
7
Exercise as the Key to Improve Cardiopulmonary Function in Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 17;24(8):237. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2408237. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Cardiac power output is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with preserved ejection fraction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 May 21;2(2):qyae048. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae048. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Improves Quality of Life and Ventricular Function With Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Mar;3(3 Pt A). doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101266. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;66(23):2594-2603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.076.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and standard therapy in inoperable patients with aortic stenosis and low EF.
Heart. 2015 Mar;101(6):463-71. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306737. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
4
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis.
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 8;370(19):1790-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400590. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
10
Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 27;62(9):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验