Suppr超能文献

静脉注射利多卡因用于术后镇痛和术后恢复的疗效和安全性:一项有试验序贯分析的系统评价。

Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospitals of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, Wuerzburg 97080, Germany

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospitals of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, Wuerzburg 97080, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):770-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improvement of postoperative pain and other perioperative outcomes remain a significant challenge and a matter of debate among perioperative clinicians. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of perioperative i.v. lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain and recovery in patients undergoing various surgical procedures.

METHODS

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and ClinicalTrials.gov, and congress proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials until May 2014, that compared patients who did or did not receive continuous perioperative i.v. lidocaine infusion.

RESULTS

Forty-five trials (2802 participants) were included. Meta-analysis suggested that lidocaine reduced postoperative pain (visual analogue scale, 0 to 10 cm) at 1-4 h (MD -0.84, 95% CI -1.10 to -0.59) and at 24 h (MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.11) after surgery, but not at 48 h (MD -0.22, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.03). Subgroup analysis and trial sequential analysis suggested pain reduction for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery or open abdominal surgery, but not for patients undergoing other surgeries. There was limited evidence of positive effects of lidocaine on postoperative gastrointestinal recovery, opioid requirements, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay. There were limited data available on the effect of systemic lidocaine on adverse effects or surgical complications. Quality of evidence was limited as a result of inconsistency (heterogeneity) and indirectness (small studies).

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence suggesting that i.v. lidocaine may be a useful adjuvant during general anaesthesia because of its beneficial impact on several outcomes after surgery.

摘要

背景

改善术后疼痛和其他围手术期结果仍然是围手术期临床医生面临的重大挑战和争议问题。本系统评价旨在评估围手术期静脉内利多卡因输注对接受各种手术患者的术后疼痛和恢复的影响。

方法

在 2014 年 5 月之前,我们通过 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库以及 ClinicalTrials.gov 和会议记录搜索了比较接受或不接受连续围手术期静脉内利多卡因输注的患者的随机对照试验。

结果

共纳入 45 项试验(2802 名参与者)。Meta 分析表明,利多卡因可减少术后 1-4 小时(MD -0.84,95%CI -1.10 至 -0.59)和 24 小时(MD -0.34,95%CI -0.57 至 -0.11)的疼痛(视觉模拟评分,0 至 10cm),但对 48 小时(MD -0.22,95%CI -0.47 至 0.03)没有影响。亚组分析和试验序贯分析表明,对于接受腹腔镜腹部手术或开放性腹部手术的患者,疼痛减轻,但对于接受其他手术的患者则没有。有限的证据表明利多卡因对术后胃肠道恢复、阿片类药物需求、术后恶心和呕吐以及住院时间有积极影响。关于全身利多卡因对不良事件或手术并发症的影响,仅有有限的数据。由于不一致性(异质性)和间接性(小型研究),证据质量有限。

结论

由于静脉内利多卡因对手术后的几个结果有有益的影响,因此有限的证据表明其可能是全身麻醉的有用辅助药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验