Zhang Wei, Hu Hong, Zhang Shi-Bao
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesKunming, China; Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant ResourcesKunming, China; University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, China.
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesKunming, China; Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant ResourcesKunming, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2016 May 3;7:588. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00588. eCollection 2016.
Due to the fluctuating water availability in the arboreal habitat, epiphytic plants are considered vulnerable to climate change and anthropogenic disturbances. Although co-occurring taxa have been observed divergent adaptive performances in response to drought, the underlying physiological and morphological mechanisms by which epiphyte species cope with water stress remain poorly understood. In the present study, two co-occurring epiphytic orchids with different phenologies were selected to investigate their drought-resistance performances. We compared their functional traits, and monitored their physiological performances in a 25-days of drought treatment. In contrast to the deciduous species Pleione albiflora, the evergreen species Coelogyne corymbosa had different root anatomical structures and higher values for saturated water content of pseudobulbs. Moreover, plants of C. corymbosa had thicker leaves and epidermis, denser veins and stomata, and higher values for leaf mass per unit area and the time required to dry saturated leaves to 70% relative water content. However, samples from that species had lower values for net photosynthetic rate (A n), stomatal length and chlorophyll content per unit dry mass. Nevertheless, due to greater capacity for water storage and conservation, C. corymbosa maintained higher A n, stomatal conductance (g s), and instantaneous water-use efficiency during severe drought period, and their values for leaf water potential were higher after the water stress treatment. By Day 10 after irrigation was restarted, only C. corymbosa plants recovered their values for A n and g s to levels close to those calculated prior to the imposition of water stress. Our results suggest that the different performance responding to drought and re-watering in two co-occurring epiphytic orchids is related to water-related traits and these two species have divergent adaptive mechanisms. Overall, C. corymbosa demonstrates drought avoidance by enhancing water uptake and storage, and by reducing water losses while P. albiflora employs a drought escape strategy by fixing more carbon during growing season and shedding leaves and roots at dry season, leaving a dormant pseudobulb to minimize transpiration. These findings may improve our understanding of the potential effects that climate change can have on the population dynamics of different epiphytic taxa.
由于树栖栖息地的水分供应波动,附生植物被认为易受气候变化和人为干扰的影响。尽管已观察到共生类群在应对干旱时具有不同的适应性表现,但附生植物物种应对水分胁迫的潜在生理和形态机制仍知之甚少。在本研究中,选择了两种物候期不同的共生附生兰花来研究它们的抗旱性能。我们比较了它们的功能性状,并在25天的干旱处理中监测了它们的生理性能。与落叶物种白花独蒜兰相比,常绿物种球花石豆兰具有不同的根系解剖结构,假鳞茎的饱和含水量更高。此外,球花石豆兰的植株叶片和表皮更厚,叶脉和气孔更密集,单位面积叶质量以及将饱和叶片干燥至相对含水量70%所需的时间更高。然而,该物种的样本净光合速率(An)、气孔长度和单位干质量叶绿素含量较低。尽管如此,由于更大的水分储存和保持能力,球花石豆兰在严重干旱时期保持了较高的An、气孔导度(gs)和瞬时水分利用效率,水分胁迫处理后其叶水势值更高。重新开始灌溉后第10天,只有球花石豆兰植株的An和gs值恢复到接近水分胁迫施加前计算的水平。我们的结果表明,两种共生附生兰花对干旱和再浇水的不同表现与水分相关性状有关,这两个物种具有不同的适应机制。总体而言,球花石豆兰通过增强水分吸收和储存以及减少水分流失来表现出避旱性,而白花独蒜兰则采用避旱策略,即在生长季节固定更多碳,在旱季落叶和落根,留下休眠假鳞茎以尽量减少蒸腾作用。这些发现可能会增进我们对气候变化对不同附生类群种群动态可能产生的潜在影响的理解。