Zeller Thomas, Gaines Peter A, Ansel Gary M, Caro Colin G
From the Department of Angiology, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Sheffield Vascular Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom (P.A.G.); Center for Critical Limb Care, Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH (G.M.A.); and Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (C.G.C.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002930.
Reintervention in the femoropopliteal artery is frequent and a major driver of cost-effectiveness. High wall shear generated by swirling blood flow is associated with reduced occurrence of atherosclerosis and restenosis. This trial investigated the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of the BioMimics 3D self-expanding tubular nitinol stent with helical centerline geometry compared with a straight stent in the femoropopliteal artery.
In a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 76 patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease were randomized 2:1 to receive a helical or a straight stent. An independent core laboratory adjudicated angiographic and ultrasound parameters. The primary safety end point was freedom from a composite of all death, target limb amputation, and target lesion revascularization at 30 days. The primary effectiveness end point was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 6 months. Patency was a secondary end point. Subjects were followed up for 2 years from intervention. The primary safety (1-sided P<0.01) and efficacy (1-sided P<0.001) end points for the helical stent were met. The proportion of patients treated with the helical stent who maintained patency at 12 and 24 months was 80% and 72%, respectively, compared with 71% and 55% for the control group. The difference was significant through 24 months (P=0.05). Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization for the helical compared with straight stent was 91% versus 92% at 12 months and 91% versus 76% at 24 months.
Both groups had similar safety outcomes and clinically driven target lesion revascularization to 2 years. However, after placement of a BioMimics 3D helical stent, there was improved patency to 2 years.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02163863.
股腘动脉再次干预很常见,是成本效益的主要驱动因素。涡流产生的高壁面切应力与动脉粥样硬化和再狭窄发生率降低相关。本试验研究了具有螺旋中心线几何形状的BioMimics 3D自膨胀管状镍钛合金支架与直支架相比在股腘动脉中的临床和血流动力学结果。
在一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验中,76例有症状的外周动脉疾病患者按2:1随机分组,分别接受螺旋支架或直支架治疗。一个独立的核心实验室对血管造影和超声参数进行判定。主要安全终点是30天时无所有死亡、靶肢体截肢和靶病变血运重建的复合事件。主要有效性终点是6个月时无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建。通畅率是次要终点。受试者从干预开始随访2年。螺旋支架达到了主要安全(单侧P<0.01)和有效性(单侧P<0.001)终点。接受螺旋支架治疗的患者在12个月和24个月时保持通畅的比例分别为80%和72%,而对照组分别为71%和55%。到24个月时差异有统计学意义(P=0.05)。螺旋支架与直支架相比,12个月时临床驱动的靶病变血运重建率分别为91%和92%,24个月时分别为91%和76%。
两组在2年时的安全结果和临床驱动的靶病变血运重建情况相似。然而,植入BioMimics 3D螺旋支架后,2年的通畅率有所提高。