• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验性螺旋骨折。拉力螺钉固定与钢板固定的体外生物力学比较。

Experimental spiral fractures. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of lag-screw fixation to plate fixation.

作者信息

Cox L G, Dahners L E, Gilbert J A

机构信息

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7055.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jun(243):189-94.

PMID:2721062
Abstract

The rigidity and strength of fixation of experimental spiral fractures in canine tibias with triple lag-screw osteosynthesis were compared with fixation by six-hole dynamic compression plating (DCP). Lag-screw fixation was 71% to 77% as stiff in bending and 69% as stiff in torsion as plate fixation. When evaluated by torsion to failure, lag-screw specimens were 68% as strong as plate specimens. Although the difference in energy to failure in torsion was not statistically significant between the two methods, both fell considerably short of control values. The lag preparation was 9% as strong as intact controls, and the plate preparation was 21% as strong as intact controls. Long spiral fractures without comminution are amenable to triple lag-screw osteosynthesis with some loss of rigidity and strength when compared to single-plate fixation. This decrease in rigidity and strength may be outweighed by the avoidance of the stress protection phenomenon noted under rigid plates.

摘要

将犬胫骨实验性螺旋骨折采用三枚拉力螺钉骨合成的固定刚度和强度与六孔动力加压接骨板(DCP)固定进行比较。拉力螺钉固定在弯曲时的刚度为接骨板固定的71%至77%,在扭转时的刚度为接骨板固定的69%。通过扭转至失效评估时,拉力螺钉标本的强度为接骨板标本的68%。尽管两种方法在扭转失效能量方面的差异无统计学意义,但两者均远低于对照值。拉力螺钉固定组的强度为完整对照组的9%,接骨板固定组的强度为完整对照组的21%。与单接骨板固定相比,无粉碎的长螺旋骨折适合采用三枚拉力螺钉骨合成,但会有一定的刚度和强度损失。这种刚度和强度的降低可能会被避免刚性接骨板下出现的应力保护现象所抵消。

相似文献

1
Experimental spiral fractures. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of lag-screw fixation to plate fixation.实验性螺旋骨折。拉力螺钉固定与钢板固定的体外生物力学比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jun(243):189-94.
2
Rigidity of pure lag-screw fixation as a function of screw inclination in an in vitro spiral osteotomy.体外螺旋截骨术中单纯拉力螺钉固定的刚度与螺钉倾斜度的关系。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Sep(178):74-9.
3
In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate.有限接触动力加压钢板与锁定加压钢板的体外生物力学比较
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2005;18(4):220-6.
4
Biomechanical stability of different fixation constructs for ORIF of radial neck fractures.桡骨颈骨折切开复位内固定不同固定结构的生物力学稳定性
Orthopedics. 2008 Oct;31(10).
5
Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.不稳定型转子间截骨模型中两种侧板固定技术的生物力学比较:动力髋螺钉与经皮加压钢板
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007 Dec;22(10):1112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
6
Dynamic compression plate fixation: a biomechanical comparison of unicortical vs bicortical distal screw fixation.动力加压钢板固定:单皮质与双皮质远端螺钉固定的生物力学比较
J Orthop Trauma. 1988;2(2):146-50.
7
Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.移位性胫骨髁间棘骨折的缝线与螺钉固定:生物力学比较
Arthroscopy. 2005 Oct;21(10):1172-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.019.
8
Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.在胫骨近端间隙模型中对多轴锁定钢板和单轴锁定钢板固定的生物力学比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Aug;23(7):507-13. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a25368.
9
[Biomechanical studies of the role of the interfragmentary traction screw in plate osteosynthesis exemplified by a short oblique tibial shaft fracture].
Aktuelle Traumatol. 1986 Apr;16(2):60-6.
10
[Screws versus screw-plate fixation of type 2 Schatzker fractures of the lateral tibial plateau. Cadaver biomechanical study. Arthroscopy French Society].[胫骨外侧平台2型Schatzker骨折的螺钉固定与螺钉钢板固定。尸体生物力学研究。法国关节镜学会]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000 Nov;86(7):707-11.