Grusky O, Tierney K
Community Ment Health J. 1989 Spring;25(1):3-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00752439.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of eight (four urban and four rural) Community Support Program (CSP) delivery systems located in a state in the northwest United States. Data were collected from 364 respondents: 156 service organization directors, 49 case managers, 77 family members, and 82 seriously mentally ill clients. Four measures of effectiveness were used: comprehensiveness (number of key services for the seriously mentally ill available), coverage (proportion of persons served who needed services), quality of services on a six-point scale, and services coordination (six-item scale). The four performance measures were found to significantly differentiate the eight counties. In five of six cases the measures were positively intercorrelated thereby confirming CSP claims that the key services are an integrated set and that it is feasible to provide a full range of services without sacrificing quality or hindering coordination.
本研究评估了位于美国西北部一个州的八个(四个城市和四个农村)社区支持项目(CSP)实施系统的有效性。数据收集自364名受访者:156名服务组织主管、49名个案经理、77名家庭成员和82名严重精神疾病患者。使用了四项有效性衡量指标:全面性(为严重精神疾病患者提供的关键服务数量)、覆盖范围(接受服务的有需求者的比例)、六点制服务质量以及服务协调(六项量表)。发现这四项绩效衡量指标能显著区分这八个县。在六个案例中的五个案例中,这些指标呈正相关,从而证实了社区支持项目的说法,即关键服务是一个整合的集合,并且在不牺牲质量或阻碍协调的情况下提供全方位服务是可行的。