Cyr Amy E, Tucker Natalia, Ademuyiwa Foluso, Margenthaler Julie A, Aft Rebecca L, Eberlein Timothy J, Appleton Catherine M, Zoberi Imran, Thomas Maria A, Gao Feng, Gillanders William E
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Aug;223(2):399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.048. Epub 2016 May 20.
Axillary surgery is not considered therapeutic in patients with clinical T1-T2 N0 breast cancer. The importance of axillary staging is eroding in an era in which tumor biology, as defined by biomarker and gene expression profile, is increasingly important in medical decision making. We hypothesized that axillary ultrasound (AUS) is a noninvasive alternative to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and AUS could replace SLNB without compromising patient care.
Patients with clinical T1-T2 N0 breast cancer and normal AUS were eligible for enrollment. Subjects were randomized to no further axillary staging (arm 1) vs SLNB (arm 2). Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results of the pilot phase of the randomized controlled trial.
Sixty-eight subjects were enrolled in the pilot phase of the trial (34 subjects in arm 1, no further staging; 32 subjects in arm 2, SLNB; and 2 subjects voluntarily withdrew from the trial). The median age was 61 years (range 40 to 80 years) in arm 1 and 59 years (range 31 to 81 years) in arm 2, and there were no significant clinical or pathologic differences between the arms. Median follow-up was 17 months (range 1 to 32 months). The negative predictive value (NPV) of AUS for identification of clinically significant axillary disease (>2.0 mm) was 96.9%. No axillary recurrences have been observed in either arm.
Successful completion of the pilot phase of the randomized controlled trial confirms the feasibility of the study design, and provides prospective evidence supporting the ability of AUS to exclude clinically significant disease in the axilla. The results provide strong support for a phase 2 randomized controlled trial.
对于临床T1 - T2 N0期乳腺癌患者,腋窝手术不被视为一种治疗手段。在肿瘤生物学(由生物标志物和基因表达谱定义)在医疗决策中日益重要的时代,腋窝分期的重要性正在逐渐降低。我们假设腋窝超声(AUS)是前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的一种非侵入性替代方法,并且AUS可以在不影响患者治疗的情况下取代SLNB。
临床T1 - T2 N0期乳腺癌且AUS正常的患者符合入组条件。受试者被随机分为不再进行腋窝分期(第1组)和进行SLNB(第2组)。描述性统计用于描述随机对照试验试点阶段的结果。
68名受试者纳入试验试点阶段(第1组34名受试者,不再进行分期;第2组32名受试者,进行SLNB;2名受试者自愿退出试验)。第1组的中位年龄为61岁(范围40至80岁),第2组为59岁(范围31至81岁),两组之间在临床或病理方面无显著差异。中位随访时间为17个月(范围1至32个月)。AUS识别具有临床意义的腋窝疾病(>2.0 mm)的阴性预测值(NPV)为96.9%。两组均未观察到腋窝复发。
随机对照试验试点阶段的成功完成证实了研究设计的可行性,并提供了前瞻性证据支持AUS排除腋窝具有临床意义疾病的能力。这些结果为2期随机对照试验提供了有力支持。