Trivedi Sumita, Srivastava Raghvendra M, Concha-Benavente Fernando, Ferrone Soldano, Garcia-Bates Tatiana M, Li Jing, Ferris Robert L
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 1;22(21):5229-5237. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2971. Epub 2016 May 23.
EGF receptor (EGFR) is highly overexpressed on several cancers and two targeted anti-EGFR antibodies which differ by isotype are FDA-approved for clinical use. Cetuximab (IgG1 isotype) inhibits downstream signaling of EGFR and activates antitumor, cellular immune mechanisms. As panitumumab (IgG2 isotype) may inhibit downstream EGFR signaling similar to cetuximab, it might also induce adaptive immunity.
We measured in vitro activation of cellular components of the innate and adaptive immune systems. We also studied the in vivo activation of components of the adaptive immune system in patient specimens from two recent clinical trials using cetuximab or panitumumab.
Both monoclonal antibodies (mAb) primarily activate natural killer (NK) cells, although cetuximab is significantly more potent than panitumumab. Cetuximab-activated neutrophils mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) tumor cells, and interestingly, this effect was FcγRIIa- and FcγRIIIa genotype-dependent. Panitumumab may activate monocytes through CD32 (FcγRIIa); however, monocytes activated by either mAb are not able to mediate ADCC. Cetuximab enhanced dendritic cell (DC) maturation to a greater extent than panitumumab, which was associated with improved tumor antigen cross-presentation by cetuximab compared with panitumumab. This correlated with increased EGFR-specific cytotoxic CD8 T cells in patients treated with cetuximab compared with those treated with panitumumab.
Although panitumumab effectively inhibits EGFR signaling to a similar extent as cetuximab, it is less effective at triggering antitumor, cellular immune mechanisms which may be crucial for effective therapy of HNSCC. Clin Cancer Res; 22(21); 5229-37. ©2016 AACR.
表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)在多种癌症中高度过表达,两种不同亚型的靶向抗EGFR抗体已获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于临床。西妥昔单抗(IgG1亚型)可抑制EGFR的下游信号传导并激活抗肿瘤细胞免疫机制。由于帕尼单抗(IgG2亚型)可能与西妥昔单抗类似地抑制EGFR下游信号传导,它也可能诱导适应性免疫。
我们检测了先天性和适应性免疫系统细胞成分的体外激活情况。我们还研究了在两项近期使用西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗的临床试验的患者样本中适应性免疫系统成分的体内激活情况。
两种单克隆抗体(mAb)主要激活自然杀伤(NK)细胞,尽管西妥昔单抗的效力明显高于帕尼单抗。西妥昔单抗激活的中性粒细胞介导针对头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)肿瘤细胞的抗体依赖性细胞毒性(ADCC),有趣的是,这种效应依赖于FcγRIIa和FcγRIIIa基因型。帕尼单抗可能通过CD32(FcγRIIa)激活单核细胞;然而,两种mAb激活的单核细胞均无法介导ADCC。与帕尼单抗相比,西妥昔单抗能更大程度地增强树突状细胞(DC)成熟,这与西妥昔单抗相比帕尼单抗改善肿瘤抗原交叉呈递有关。这与接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者中EGFR特异性细胞毒性CD8 T细胞相比接受帕尼单抗治疗的患者增加相关。
尽管帕尼单抗与西妥昔单抗一样有效地抑制EGFR信号传导,但在触发抗肿瘤细胞免疫机制方面效果较差,而这可能对HNSCC的有效治疗至关重要。《临床癌症研究》;22(21);5229 - 37。©2016美国癌症研究协会。