Suppr超能文献

静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚与静脉注射吗啡治疗急性肢体创伤的疗效比较

Efficacy of Intravenous Paracetamol Versus Intravenous Morphine in Acute Limb Trauma.

作者信息

Jalili Mohammad, Mozaffarpour Noori Ali, Sedaghat Mojtaba, Safaie Arash

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran.

出版信息

Trauma Mon. 2016 Feb 6;21(1):e19649. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.19649. eCollection 2016 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efficient pain management is one of the most important components of care in the field of emergency medicine.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to compare intravenous paracetamol and intravenous morphine sulfate for acute pain reduction in patients with limb trauma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a randomized double-blinded clinical trial, all patients (aged 18 years and older) with acute limb trauma and a pain score of greater than 3/10 in the emergency department were recruited; they received either 1 g intravenous paracetamol or 0.1 mg/kg intravenous morphine sulfate over 15 minutes. The primary outcome was the pain score measured on a numerical rating scale at 0, 15 and 30 minutes after commencing drug administration. The requirement for rescue analgesia and the frequency of adverse reactions were also recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty patients randomly received either IV paracetamol (n = 30) or IV morphine (n = 30). The mean reduction in numerical rating scale pain intensity scores at 30 minutes was 3.86 (± 1.61) for paracetamol, and 2.16 (± 1.39) for morphine. However, pain relief was significantly higher in the paracetamol group compared to the morphine group (P < 0.001). Four patients in the paracetamol group and 15 patients in the morphine group needed rescue analgesia and the difference was significant (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous paracetamol appears to provide better analgesia than intravenous morphine in acute limb trauma. Further larger studies are required.

摘要

背景

有效的疼痛管理是急诊医学领域护理中最重要的组成部分之一。

目的

本研究旨在比较静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚和静脉注射硫酸吗啡在减轻肢体创伤患者急性疼痛方面的效果。

患者与方法

在一项随机双盲临床试验中,招募了所有在急诊科患有急性肢体创伤且疼痛评分大于3/10的18岁及以上患者;他们在15分钟内接受了1克静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚或0.1毫克/千克静脉注射硫酸吗啡。主要结局是在开始给药后0、15和30分钟时用数字评分量表测量的疼痛评分。还记录了急救镇痛的需求和不良反应的发生频率。

结果

60名患者随机接受静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚(n = 30)或静脉注射吗啡(n = 30)。对乙酰氨基酚组在30分钟时数字评分量表疼痛强度评分的平均降低值为3.86(±1.61),吗啡组为2.16(±1.39)。然而,与吗啡组相比,对乙酰氨基酚组的疼痛缓解明显更高(P < 0.001)。对乙酰氨基酚组有4名患者和吗啡组有15名患者需要急救镇痛,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。

结论

在急性肢体创伤中,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚似乎比静脉注射吗啡提供更好的镇痛效果。需要进一步开展更大规模的研究。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Do ethnic differences still exist in pain assessment and treatment in the emergency department?
Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Dec;13(4):194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.06.001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验