• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[防腐剂在慢性伤口中的作用及生物膜清除策略]

[THE ROLE OF ANTISEPTICS AND STRATEGY OF BIOFILM REMOVAL IN CHRONIC WOUND].

作者信息

Kucisec-Tepes Nastja

出版信息

Acta Med Croatica. 2016 Mar;70(1):33-42.

PMID:27220188
Abstract

Chronic wound does not heal within the expected time frame because it remains in the inflammation phase of healing. The reason for this is the presence of necrotic tissue and a large number of microorganisms, primarily bacteria that secrete the biofilm, along with ischemia, hypoxia and edema. Biofilm is present in 90% of chronic wounds and 6% of the acute ones. Biofilm is a corporative association of microbes which adhere to the surface of the wound, guided by quorum sensing molecules. The association is surrounded by a moisturizing matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (slime) which protect the microbes from the impact of antibiotics, antiseptics, macro-organism defense and stress. Biofilm is the primary cause of the wound chronicity because it causes permanent inflammation, delayed granulation tissue formation and migration of epithelium cells, thus providing a reservoir of microbes that lead to infection of the chronic wound. The aim of good clinical practice is to enable healing of a chronic wound within the expected time frame. In order to achieve this aim, it is necessary to reduce and thoroughly remove the biofilm from the wound and prevent its reappearance. This is achieved by the application of active anti-biofilm compounds and procedures that disintegrate the quorum sensing molecules, degrade the extracellular polymeric substances and block adherence to the surfaces. Recent researches have shown that the application of antiseptics is effective in the prevention of infection and is a support to targeted treatment. However, the fact is that only some antiseptics are applicable to chronic wounds and can have an impact on biofilms of the primary infective agents such as Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Effective antiseptics are octenidine dihydrochloride, polyhexanides, povidone and cadexomer iodine, nanocrystal silver and Manuka-type honey. Immobile biofilm is a persistent problem of chronic and chronic infected wounds. In fact, there is no isolated therapeutic procedure or an individual antiseptic that can fully destroy the biofilm. For this reason, modern strategy in the management of chronic wound applies a multimodal approach which combines mechanical-chemical procedures such as debridement, antiseptics, and antimicrobial supportive compresses. Debridement creates a therapeutic 'window' for the action of antiseptics and antibiotics in a 72-hour period, which enables removal of the biofilm and active destruction of the sessile and planktonic bacteria. This approach also prevents de novo formation of the biofilm. The above procedures must be intensively repeated, and antiseptics and supportive compresses changed, depending on the phase of the wound bed and comorbidity factors in the patient. The results of clinical studies show that only such a proactive approach to chronic wound enables achievement of healing within the expected period of time.

摘要

慢性伤口无法在预期时间内愈合,因为它一直处于愈合的炎症阶段。其原因在于存在坏死组织和大量微生物,主要是分泌生物膜的细菌,同时伴有局部缺血、缺氧和水肿。生物膜存在于90%的慢性伤口和6%的急性伤口中。生物膜是微生物的协作联合体,在群体感应分子的引导下附着于伤口表面。该联合体被细胞外聚合物(黏液)的保湿基质所包围,这保护微生物免受抗生素、防腐剂、机体防御和应激的影响。生物膜是伤口慢性化的主要原因,因为它会引发持续炎症、延迟肉芽组织形成以及上皮细胞迁移,从而提供导致慢性伤口感染的微生物库。良好临床实践的目标是使慢性伤口在预期时间内愈合。为实现这一目标,有必要减少并彻底清除伤口中的生物膜,防止其再次出现。这可通过应用活性抗生物膜化合物以及分解群体感应分子、降解细胞外聚合物并阻止其附着于表面的程序来实现。近期研究表明,应用防腐剂在预防感染方面有效,且有助于靶向治疗。然而,事实上只有一些防腐剂适用于慢性伤口,并且能对主要感染病原体如葡萄球菌属、链球菌属和铜绿假单胞菌的生物膜产生影响。有效的防腐剂有二盐酸奥替尼啶、聚己缩胍、聚维酮和碘仿糊剂、纳米晶银和麦卢卡型蜂蜜。固定的生物膜是慢性和慢性感染伤口的一个持续问题。实际上,不存在能完全破坏生物膜的单一治疗程序或单独一种防腐剂。因此,慢性伤口管理的现代策略采用多模式方法,将清创、防腐剂和抗菌支持性敷料等机械 - 化学程序结合起来。清创为防腐剂和抗生素在72小时内发挥作用创造了一个治疗“窗口”,这能够清除生物膜并有效杀灭固着和浮游细菌。这种方法还能防止生物膜重新形成。上述程序必须根据伤口床的阶段和患者的合并症因素重复进行,同时更换防腐剂和支持性敷料。临床研究结果表明,只有这种对慢性伤口积极主动的方法才能在预期时间内实现愈合。

相似文献

1
[THE ROLE OF ANTISEPTICS AND STRATEGY OF BIOFILM REMOVAL IN CHRONIC WOUND].[防腐剂在慢性伤口中的作用及生物膜清除策略]
Acta Med Croatica. 2016 Mar;70(1):33-42.
2
[CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF PRESSURE ULCER INFECTION].[压力性溃疡感染的特征]
Acta Med Croatica. 2016;70 Suppl 1:45-51.
3
[Prevention of chronic wound infection].[慢性伤口感染的预防]
Acta Med Croatica. 2013 Oct;67 Suppl 1:51-8.
4
Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management.伤口管理中的抗菌和防腐策略。
Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-14. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12175.
5
Update on the role of antiseptics in the management of chronic wounds with critical colonisation and/or biofilm.关于具有严重定植和/或生物膜的慢性伤口管理中抗菌剂作用的最新进展。
Int Wound J. 2021 Jun;18(3):342-358. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13537. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
6
Approach to chronic wound infections.慢性伤口感染的处理方法。
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Aug;173(2):351-8. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13677. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
7
Efficacy of antiseptics containing povidone-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride and ethacridine lactate against biofilm formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus measured with the novel biofilm-oriented antiseptics test.采用新型生物膜导向性防腐剂测试法测定含聚维酮碘、二盐酸奥替尼啶和乳酸依沙吖啶的防腐剂对铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌形成的生物膜的疗效。
Int Wound J. 2014 Dec;11(6):730-4. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12057. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
[IMPACT OF BIOFILM ON HEALING AND A METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING IT IN THE WOUND].[生物膜对伤口愈合的影响及伤口中生物膜的识别方法]
Acta Med Croatica. 2016 Mar;70(1):29-32.
9
Antiseptics for treating infected wounds: Efficacy on biofilms and effect of pH.用于治疗感染伤口的防腐剂:对生物膜的疗效及pH值的影响
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016;42(2):293-309. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2014.940495. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
10
Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.一种新型抗菌敷料对铜绿假单胞菌伤口生物膜体内影响的定量比较分析:采用兔耳模型
Wound Repair Regen. 2014 Nov-Dec;22(6):712-9. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12232. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
An Update on Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Its Management Modalities.糖尿病足溃疡及其治疗方法的最新进展
Indian J Microbiol. 2024 Dec;64(4):1401-1415. doi: 10.1007/s12088-023-01180-8. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
2
Alternative Approaches for the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡管理的替代方法。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Oct 5;12:747618. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.747618. eCollection 2021.
3
Measurement of wound area for early analysis of the scar predictive factor.测量伤口面积以早期分析瘢痕预测因素。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3299. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3708.3299. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
4
Chronic wound biofilms: diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.慢性创面生物膜:诊断与治疗策略。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Nov 20;132(22):2737-2744. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000523.