Reese Jennifer Barsky, Haythornthwaite Jennifer A
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Oct;24(10):4309-17. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3265-4. Epub 2016 May 25.
The primary objectives were (1) to examine the importance of sexuality within the self-view and cross-sectional correlates for 120 colorectal cancer patients and (2) to determine whether the importance of sexuality changed for 46 colorectal cancer patients and partners participating in an intimacy enhancement intervention.
Two newly developed items assessed importance of sexuality within the self-view (1) currently and (2) before cancer; a calculated change score assessed perceived change. In the cross-sectional sample, associations between importance of sexuality and demographic and medical factors and sexual function status were examined. Intervention participants' importance ratings before and after participation were used to calculate effect sizes.
For patients, importance of sexuality before cancer was greater (M = 65.7) than current importance (M = 56.8, p = .001). Greater current importance of sexuality was associated with partnered status, non-metastatic disease, and not being in treatment. Scoring in the sexually functional range was associated with greater current importance of sexuality for men and a smaller perceived change in importance for both men and women (p values <.05). Sexual function status also significantly predicted current importance independent of covariates. Small to medium effect sizes for intervention patients (.37) and partners (.60) were found for increases in importance of sexuality. Items showed evidence of test-retest reliability and construct validity.
Coping with sexual concerns is important to those affected by colorectal cancer. Findings suggest that the importance of sexuality can decrease through colorectal cancer and associated sexual problems and can increase through participating in an intimacy-focused intervention.
主要目标是:(1)研究120名结直肠癌患者自我认知中性生活的重要性及其横断面相关性;(2)确定46名参与亲密关系增强干预的结直肠癌患者及其伴侣的性生活重要性是否发生变化。
两个新开发的项目评估了性生活在自我认知中的重要性,一是当前的重要性,二是癌症前的重要性;计算得出的变化分数评估了感知到的变化。在横断面样本中,研究了性生活重要性与人口统计学、医学因素以及性功能状况之间的关联。干预参与者参与前后的重要性评分用于计算效应量。
对于患者而言,癌症前性生活的重要性(M = 65.7)高于当前的重要性(M = 56.8,p = .001)。当前更高的性生活重要性与伴侣状态、非转移性疾病以及未接受治疗相关。性功能处于正常范围与男性当前更高的性生活重要性以及男性和女性感知到的重要性变化较小相关(p值 <.05)。性功能状况在不考虑协变量的情况下也显著预测了当前的重要性。干预患者(效应量为.37)及其伴侣(效应量为.60)的性生活重要性增加呈现出小到中等的效应量。项目显示出重测信度和结构效度的证据。
应对性方面的担忧对结直肠癌患者很重要。研究结果表明,结直肠癌及相关性问题可能会降低性生活的重要性,而参与以亲密关系为重点的干预则可能会增加其重要性。