Suppr超能文献

患者参与研究优先级(PIRE):一项研究方案

Patient involvement in research priorities (PIRE): a study protocol.

作者信息

Piil Karin, Jarden Mary

机构信息

University Hospitals Center for Health Research (UCSF) and Center for Integrated Rehabilitation of Cancer Patients (CIRE), Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Neurosurgery, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

University Hospitals Center for Health Research (UCSF) and Center for Integrated Rehabilitation of Cancer Patients (CIRE), Copenhagen, Denmark Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 May 24;6(5):e010615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010615.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient involvement in healthcare has expanded from the clinical practice setting to include collaboration during the research process. There has been a growing international interest in patient and public involvement in setting research priorities to reduce the risk of discrepancy between what patients with cancer and their relatives experience as important unanswered questions and those which are actually researched. This study aims to challenge the conventional research process by inviting patients with life-threatening cancer (primary malignant brain tumours or acute leukaemia), relatives and patient organisations to join forces with clinical specialists and researchers to identify, discuss and prioritise supportive care and rehabilitation issues in future research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an exploratory qualitative study comprising two sets of three focus group interviews (FGIs): one set for primary malignant brain tumours and the other for acute leukaemia. Separate FGIs will be carried out with patients and relatives including representation from patient organisations and clinical specialists to identify important unanswered questions and research topics within each group. The FGIs will be video/audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. This study will contribute to a patient-centred research agenda that captures issues that patients, their relatives, clinical specialists and researchers consider important.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is registered at the Danish Data Protection Agency (number: 2012-58-0004) and the Scientific Ethics Review Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (number: H-15001485). Papers will be published describing the methods applied and the supportive care and rehabilitation issues that are identified as important for future research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN57131943; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

患者参与医疗保健已从临床实践环境扩展到包括在研究过程中的协作。国际上越来越关注患者和公众参与确定研究重点,以降低癌症患者及其亲属认为重要但未得到解答的问题与实际研究问题之间出现差异的风险。本研究旨在挑战传统研究过程,邀请患有危及生命癌症(原发性恶性脑肿瘤或急性白血病)的患者、亲属和患者组织与临床专家和研究人员携手合作,确定、讨论未来研究中支持性护理和康复问题的优先次序。

方法与分析

这是一项探索性定性研究,包括两组各三次焦点小组访谈(FGIs):一组针对原发性恶性脑肿瘤,另一组针对急性白血病。将分别与患者和亲属进行焦点小组访谈,包括患者组织和临床专家的代表,以确定每组中重要的未解答问题和研究主题。焦点小组访谈将进行视频/音频记录、转录并进行主题分析。本研究将有助于制定以患者为中心的研究议程,该议程将涵盖患者、其亲属、临床专家和研究人员认为重要的问题。

伦理与传播

该研究已在丹麦数据保护局注册(编号:2012 - 58 - 0004)以及丹麦首都地区科学伦理审查委员会注册(编号:H - 15001485)。将发表论文描述所应用的方法以及被确定为对未来研究重要的支持性护理和康复问题。

试验注册号

ISRCTN57131943;预结果。

相似文献

1
Patient involvement in research priorities (PIRE): a study protocol.
BMJ Open. 2016 May 24;6(5):e010615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010615.
2
Research agenda for life-threatening cancer.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12935. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12935. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
5
Prioritising patient care: The different views of clinicians and managers.
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Sep;25(6):746-759. doi: 10.1177/0969733016664977. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
10
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research: a scoping review of contemporary practice.
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 30;9(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00490-x.
4
Haemochromatosis patients' research priorities: Towards an improved quality of life.
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2293-2301. doi: 10.1111/hex.13830. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
Cultural Knowledge in Context - People Aged 50 Years and Over Make Sense of a First Fracture and Osteoporosis.
J Patient Exp. 2023 Jan 17;10:23743735231151537. doi: 10.1177/23743735231151537. eCollection 2023.
6
Enabling Transdisciplinary Collaboration: Stakeholder Views on Working With "Children With Mentally Ill Parents" Research Groups.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 23;12:760716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760716. eCollection 2021.
9
Partnering with frail or seriously ill patients in research: a systematic review.
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 11;6:52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00225-2. eCollection 2020.
10
Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a focus group study.
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Jun 16;15(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00766-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Priorities in CKD: Report of a National Workshop Conducted in Australia.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Aug;66(2):212-22. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.02.341. Epub 2015 May 2.
2
A patient-centered research agenda for the care of the acutely ill older patient.
J Hosp Med. 2015 May;10(5):318-27. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2356. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
Research priority setting in kidney disease: a systematic review.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 May;65(5):674-83. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.011. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
6
Patient-centered priorities for improving medication management and adherence.
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jan;98(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
7
Determining research priorities through partnership with patients: an overview.
Semin Dial. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):141-6. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12325. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
8
Making patient and public involvement in cancer and palliative research a reality: academic support is vital for success.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Jun;5(2):203-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000750. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验