Suppr超能文献

情境中的文化知识——50岁及以上人群对首次骨折和骨质疏松症的理解

Cultural Knowledge in Context - People Aged 50 Years and Over Make Sense of a First Fracture and Osteoporosis.

作者信息

Harasym Patricia, Beaupre Lauren A, Juby Angela G, Kivi Paul, Majumdar Sumit R, Hanson Heather M

机构信息

Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2023 Jan 17;10:23743735231151537. doi: 10.1177/23743735231151537. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Catch a Break (CaB) is a secondary fracture prevention program that uses medical understandings of osteoporosis to assess first fractures and determine appropriateness for secondary fracture prevention. In this study, we interviewed CaB program participants to identify the understandings that patients themselves used to make sense of first fractures and the osteoporosis suggestion as cause. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with female and male participants of the CaB program in Canada. An interpretive practice approach was used to analyze the data. A random sample of 20 individuals, 12 women, and eight men all aged 50 years and over participated. First fractures were produced as meaningful in the context of osteoporosis only for seniors of very advanced age, and for people of any age with poor nutrition. The trauma events that led to a first fracture were produced as meaningful only if perceived as accidents, and having an active lifestyle was produced as beneficial only for mental health and well-being unrelated to osteoporosis. Cultural knowledge shapes, but does not determine, how individuals make sense of their health and illness experiences. Risk prevention program designers should include patients on the design team and be more aware of the presumptive knowledge used to identify individuals at risk of disease.

摘要

“抓住机会”(CaB)是一项继发性骨折预防计划,该计划利用对骨质疏松症的医学认识来评估初次骨折情况,并确定继发性骨折预防的适宜性。在本研究中,我们采访了CaB计划的参与者,以确定患者自身用于理解初次骨折以及将骨质疏松症建议视为病因的认识。我们对加拿大CaB计划的女性和男性参与者进行了半结构化访谈。采用解释性实践方法对数据进行分析。随机抽取了20名年龄在50岁及以上的个体,其中包括12名女性和8名男性参与。仅在年龄非常大的老年人以及营养状况不佳的任何年龄段人群中,初次骨折才在骨质疏松症的背景下被视为有意义。只有当导致初次骨折的创伤事件被视为意外时,才被视为有意义,而积极的生活方式仅对与骨质疏松症无关的心理健康和幸福有益。文化知识塑造但不决定个体如何理解他们的健康和疾病经历。风险预防计划设计者应让患者参与设计团队,并更加了解用于识别疾病风险个体的假定知识。

相似文献

1
Cultural Knowledge in Context - People Aged 50 Years and Over Make Sense of a First Fracture and Osteoporosis.
J Patient Exp. 2023 Jan 17;10:23743735231151537. doi: 10.1177/23743735231151537. eCollection 2023.
3
Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(20):1-180. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
5
Men's experiences of having osteoporosis vertebral fractures: a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analyses.
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jul;30(7):1403-1412. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04973-0. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Integrating a gender dimension into osteoporosis and fracture risk research.
Gend Med. 2007;4 Suppl B:S147-61. doi: 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80055-6.
8
Clinical risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in Brazilian women and men: the Brazilian Osteoporosis Study (BRAZOS).
Osteoporos Int. 2009 Mar;20(3):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0680-5. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
9
Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture.
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Patient perceptions of provider barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention.
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Nov;25(11):2581-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2804-4. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of bisphosphonates in osteoporosis caused by adult growth hormone deficiency.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jun 28;49(6):839-847. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230469.

本文引用的文献

8
Exercise Early and Often: Effects of Physical Activity and Exercise on Women's Bone Health.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 28;15(5):878. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050878.
9
Experiences of being diagnosed with osteoporosis: a meta-synthesis.
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 6;13(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0436-6.
10
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验