Gwon Jun Gyo, Jun Heungman, Kim Myung Gyu, Boo Yoon Jung, Jung Cheol Woong
From the Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan Medical College and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Jun;14(3):282-6.
Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is performed in many centers for donor nephrectomy. A midline incision for hand-assisted port placement is generally used but produces an unsightly scar. In this study, patients who had hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with low transverse incision were compared with those who received a midline incision.
Our study group included patients who received hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy from February 2012 to December 2014 at Korea University Anam Hospital. We retrospectively compared outcomes of these patients based on midline incision (45 patients) versus low transverse incision (17 patients). Risk factors, including age, sex, body mass index, creatinine level, glomerular filtration rate of allograft, side of graft kidney, number of renal arteries, duration of surgical procedure, and warm ischemic time, were compared between the midline and low transverse incision groups.
When we compared the midline versus low transverse incision groups, duration of surgical procedure (P = .043), postoperative day 3 glomerular filtration rate (P = .017), and postoperative day 3 pain score (P = .049) were significantly higher in the low transverse incision group versus the midline incision group. Postoperative day 3 results for duration of hospitalization (P = .030) and pain score (P = .021) were also significantly higher in the low transverse versus midline incision groups when we focused on patients with left nephrectomy.
Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with low transverse incision is more painful and necessitates a longer hospital stay and longer surgical procedure. Despite these disadvantages, hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with low transverse incision can offer a better cosmetic outcome with no definitive differences regarding renal function compared with a midline incision. Surgeons should consider these aspects when deciding on the best method for donor nephrectomy.
许多中心都采用手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术来进行供肾切除。手辅助端口置入通常采用中线切口,但会留下难看的疤痕。在本研究中,将接受低横切口手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术的患者与接受中线切口的患者进行了比较。
我们的研究组包括2012年2月至2014年12月在韩国大学安岩医院接受手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术的患者。我们回顾性比较了这些患者基于中线切口(45例患者)与低横切口(17例患者)的手术结果。比较了中线切口组和低横切口组之间的危险因素,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、肌酐水平、移植肾的肾小球滤过率、移植肾侧、肾动脉数量、手术时间和热缺血时间。
当我们比较中线切口组和低横切口组时,低横切口组的手术时间(P = 0.043)、术后第3天的肾小球滤过率(P = 0.017)和术后第3天的疼痛评分(P = 0.049)显著高于中线切口组。当我们关注左肾切除术患者时,低横切口组术后第3天的住院时间(P = 0.030)和疼痛评分(P = 0.021)也显著高于中线切口组。
低横切口手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术疼痛更明显,需要更长的住院时间和更长的手术时间。尽管有这些缺点,但与中线切口相比,低横切口手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术在肾功能方面没有明显差异,但能提供更好的美容效果。外科医生在决定供肾切除的最佳方法时应考虑这些方面。