Mohamed Aboshanif, Omi Eigo, Honda Kohei, Suzuki Shinsuke, Ishikawa Kazuo
Akita Graduate School of Medicine, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Akita, Japan.
Akita Graduate School of Medicine, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Akita, Japan.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov-Dec;82(6):702-709. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
There is no technique of facial nerve reconstruction that guarantees facial function recovery up to grade III.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different facial nerve reconstruction techniques.
Facial nerve reconstruction was performed in 22 patients (facial nerve interpositional graft in 11 patients and hypoglossal-facial nerve transfer in another 11 patients). All patients had facial function House-Brackmann (HB) grade VI, either caused by trauma or after resection of a tumor. All patients were submitted to a primary nerve reconstruction except 7 patients, where late reconstruction was performed two weeks to four months after the initial surgery. The follow-up period was at least two years.
For facial nerve interpositional graft technique, we achieved facial function HB grade III in eight patients and grade IV in three patients. Synkinesis was found in eight patients, and facial contracture with synkinesis was found in two patients. In regards to hypoglossal-facial nerve transfer using different modifications, we achieved facial function HB grade III in nine patients and grade IV in two patients. Facial contracture, synkinesis and tongue atrophy were found in three patients, and synkinesis was found in five patients. However, those who had primary direct facial-hypoglossal end-to-side anastomosis showed the best result without any neurological deficit.
Among various reanimation techniques, when indicated, direct end-to-side facial-hypoglossal anastomosis through epineural suturing is the most effective technique with excellent outcomes for facial reanimation and preservation of tongue movement, particularly when performed as a primary technique.
目前尚无一种面神经重建技术能够保证面部功能恢复至Ⅲ级。
评估不同面神经重建技术的疗效和安全性。
对22例患者进行面神经重建(11例行面神经间置移植术,另11例行舌下神经-面神经吻合术)。所有患者面部功能均为House-Brackmann(HB)Ⅵ级,病因均为外伤或肿瘤切除术后。除7例患者在初次手术后2周~4个月进行二期重建外,其余患者均接受一期神经重建。随访期至少2年。
面神经间置移植术患者中,8例面部功能达HBⅢ级,3例达Ⅳ级。8例出现联动,2例出现伴有联动的面部挛缩。对于采用不同改良方法的舌下神经-面神经吻合术,9例面部功能达HBⅢ级,2例达Ⅳ级。3例出现面部挛缩、联动和舌萎缩,5例出现联动。然而,采用一期直接面神经-舌下神经端侧吻合术的患者效果最佳,未出现任何神经功能缺损。
在各种修复技术中,若有指征,通过神经外膜缝合进行直接端侧面神经-舌下神经吻合术是最有效的技术,对面部修复和保留舌运动具有良好效果,尤其是作为一期技术实施时。