Suppr超能文献

压疮发生率的可靠性:我们能在多大程度上精确区分不同医院科室,标准的信号噪声可靠性测量能否反映这种精确性?

Reliability of Pressure Ulcer Rates: How Precisely Can We Differentiate Among Hospital Units, and Does the Standard Signal-Noise Reliability Measure Reflect This Precision?

作者信息

Staggs Vincent S, Cramer Emily

机构信息

Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO, 64108.

School of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 2016 Aug;39(4):298-305. doi: 10.1002/nur.21727. Epub 2016 May 25.

Abstract

Hospital performance reports often include rankings of unit pressure ulcer rates. Differentiating among units on the basis of quality requires reliable measurement. Our objectives were to describe and apply methods for assessing reliability of hospital-acquired pressure ulcer rates and evaluate a standard signal-noise reliability measure as an indicator of precision of differentiation among units. Quarterly pressure ulcer data from 8,199 critical care, step-down, medical, surgical, and medical-surgical nursing units from 1,299 US hospitals were analyzed. Using beta-binomial models, we estimated between-unit variability (signal) and within-unit variability (noise) in annual unit pressure ulcer rates. Signal-noise reliability was computed as the ratio of between-unit variability to the total of between- and within-unit variability. To assess precision of differentiation among units based on ranked pressure ulcer rates, we simulated data to estimate the probabilities of a unit's observed pressure ulcer rate rank in a given sample falling within five and ten percentiles of its true rank, and the probabilities of units with ulcer rates in the highest quartile and highest decile being identified as such. We assessed the signal-noise measure as an indicator of differentiation precision by computing its correlations with these probabilities. Pressure ulcer rates based on a single year of quarterly or weekly prevalence surveys were too susceptible to noise to allow for precise differentiation among units, and signal-noise reliability was a poor indicator of precision of differentiation. To ensure precise differentiation on the basis of true differences, alternative methods of assessing reliability should be applied to measures purported to differentiate among providers or units based on quality. © 2016 The Authors. Research in Nursing & Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

医院绩效报告通常会包含各科室压力性溃疡发生率的排名。基于质量对各科室进行区分需要可靠的测量方法。我们的目标是描述并应用评估医院获得性压力性溃疡发生率可靠性的方法,并评估一种标准的信噪比可靠性指标,以此作为各科室区分精度的指标。我们分析了来自美国1299家医院的8199个重症监护、逐步降级护理、内科、外科以及内科 - 外科护理科室的季度压力性溃疡数据。使用贝塔二项式模型,我们估计了各科室年度压力性溃疡发生率的科室间变异性(信号)和科室内部变异性(噪声)。信噪比可靠性通过科室间变异性与科室间和科室内部变异性总和的比值来计算。为了评估基于压力性溃疡发生率排名对各科室进行区分的精度,我们模拟数据以估计在给定样本中,一个科室观察到的压力性溃疡发生率排名落在其真实排名的5%和10%百分位数范围内的概率,以及溃疡发生率处于最高四分位数和最高十分位数的科室被正确识别的概率。我们通过计算信噪比指标与这些概率的相关性,来评估其作为区分精度指标的情况。基于单一年度季度或每周患病率调查得出的压力性溃疡发生率对噪声过于敏感,无法对各科室进行精确区分,且信噪比可靠性并非区分精度的良好指标。为了基于真实差异确保精确区分,对于旨在基于质量区分提供者或科室的指标,应采用其他评估可靠性的方法。© 2016作者。《护理与健康研究》由威利期刊公司出版。

相似文献

3
A pressure ulcer and fall rate quality composite index for acute care units: A measure development study.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
4
Reliability assessment of a hospital quality measure based on rates of adverse outcomes on nursing units.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2951-2961. doi: 10.1177/0962280215618688. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
Bayesian and frequentist approaches to assessing reliability and precision of health-care provider quality measures.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Jun;26(3):1341-1349. doi: 10.1177/0962280215577410. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
8
Exploring variation in pressure ulcer prevalence in Sweden and the USA: benchmarking in action.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Aug;18(4):904-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01702.x. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
10
Linking RN workgroup job satisfaction to pressure ulcers among older adults on acute care hospital units.
Res Nurs Health. 2013 Apr;36(2):181-90. doi: 10.1002/nur.21531. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Limitations of the Inter-Unit Reliability: A Set of Practical Examples.
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2024 Jun;24(2):156-169. doi: 10.1007/s10742-023-00307-0. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
2
Split-sample reliability estimation in health care quality measurement: Once is not enough.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14310. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14310. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Do Proposed Quality Measures for Carpal Tunnel Release Reveal Important Quality Gaps and Are They Reliable?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1743-1750. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002175. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
4
The profile inter-unit reliability.
Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):654-663. doi: 10.1111/biom.13167. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
5
Inter-Unit Reliability for Quality Measure Testing.
J Hosp Adm. 2019 Apr;8(2):1-6. doi: 10.5430/jha.v8n2p1. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Bayesian and frequentist approaches to assessing reliability and precision of health-care provider quality measures.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Jun;26(3):1341-1349. doi: 10.1177/0962280215577410. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
3
Performance profiling in primary care: does the choice of statistical model matter?
Med Decis Making. 2014 Feb;34(2):192-205. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13498825. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
4
Reliability of superficial surgical site infections as a hospital quality measure.
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Aug;213(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 31.
6
Physician cost profiling--reliability and risk of misclassification.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):1014-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0906323.
9
A systematic review of interrater reliability of pressure ulcer classification systems.
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Feb;18(3):315-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02569.x.
10
Improving quality indicator report cards through Bayesian modeling.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Nov 18;8:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-77.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验