Loughlin Michael, Wyer Peter, Tanenbaum Sandra J
Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, MMU Cheshire, Crewe, UK.
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Aug;22(4):628-33. doi: 10.1111/jep.12552. Epub 2016 May 26.
Professor Jenicek's paper is confused in that his proposal to 'integrate' what he means by 'evidence-based scientific theory and cognitive approaches to medical thinking' actually embodies a contradiction. But, although confused, he succeeds in teaching us more about the EBM debate than those who seem keen to forge ahead without addressing the underlying epistemological problems that Jenicek brings to our attention. Fundamental questions about the relationship between evidence, knowledge and reason still require resolution if we are to see a genuine advance in this debate.
杰尼塞克教授的论文令人困惑,因为他提出的“整合”其所谓“基于证据的科学理论和医学思维认知方法”的提议实际上自相矛盾。但是,尽管其论文令人困惑,但与那些似乎急于在不解决杰尼塞克提请我们注意的潜在认识论问题的情况下继续推进的人相比,他让我们对循证医学的争论有了更多了解。如果我们想在这场争论中取得真正的进展,关于证据、知识和理性之间关系的基本问题仍需解决。