Giampaolino Pierluigi, Morra Ilaria, Della Corte Luigi, Sparice Stefania, Di Carlo Costantino, Nappi Carmine, Bifulco Giuseppe
a Department of Obstetrics , Gynecology, and Urology and.
b Department of Public Health , University of Naples "Federico II" , Naples , Italy.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017 Jan;33(1):26-29. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2016.1188280. Epub 2016 May 26.
Aim of the study was to asses and compare serum anti-Mullerian harmone (AMH) levels after laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) and transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL) ovarian drilling in clomifene citrate (CC)-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients; secondary outcome was to evaluate postoperative pain to estimate the acceptability of procedures. A total of 246 patients with CC-resistant PCOS were randomized into two groups: 123 underwent LOD and 123 underwent THL ovarian drilling. AMH serum levels were evaluated before and after the procedure; moreover, women were asked to rate pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain, perfectly acceptable) to 10 (unbearable pain, completely unacceptable). In both groups, postoperative serum AMH levels were significantly reduced compared to preoperative levels (6.06 ± 1.18 and 5.84 ± 1.16 versus 5.00 ± 1.29 and 4.83 ± 1.10; p < 0.0001). Comparing postoperative serum AMH levels, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two surgical technique. After the procedure, mean pain VAS score was significantly higher for women who underwent LOD ovarian drilling in comparison to THL (3.26 ± 1.1 versus 1.11 ± 0.5; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, THL ovarian drilling is comparable to the LOD in terms of reduction in AMH, but it is preferred by patients in terms of acceptability. These results could support to use of THL ovarian drilling in the treatment of patients with CC- resistant PCOS.
本研究的目的是评估和比较在枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)抵抗的多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者中,腹腔镜卵巢打孔术(LOD)和经阴道水腹腔镜(THL)卵巢打孔术后血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平;次要结果是评估术后疼痛以估计手术的可接受性。总共246例CC抵抗的PCOS患者被随机分为两组:123例行LOD,123例行THL卵巢打孔术。在手术前后评估AMH血清水平;此外,要求女性使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛进行评分,范围从0(无疼痛,完全可接受)到10(无法忍受的疼痛,完全不可接受)。在两组中,术后血清AMH水平与术前水平相比均显著降低(6.06±1.18和5.84±1.16对比5.00±1.29和4.83±1.10;p<0.0001)。比较术后血清AMH水平,两种手术技术之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。手术后,与THL相比,接受LOD卵巢打孔术的女性的平均疼痛VAS评分显著更高(3.26±1.1对比1.11±0.5;p<0.0001)。总之,THL卵巢打孔术在降低AMH方面与LOD相当,但在可接受性方面更受患者青睐。这些结果可能支持在CC抵抗的PCOS患者治疗中使用THL卵巢打孔术。