Gidwani Risha, Joyce Nina, Kinosian Bruce, Faricy-Anderson Katherine, Levy Cari, Miller Susan C, Ersek Mary, Wagner Todd, Mor Vincent
1 Health Economics Resource Center (HERC), Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i) , VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
2 Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University , Stanford, California.
J Palliat Med. 2016 Sep;19(9):957-63. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0514. Epub 2016 May 26.
Specialty societies recommend patients with advanced cancer receive early exposure to palliative care and exposure to hospice care.
We sought to understand real-world practice of care, specifically, the timing of palliative care, and how timing and duration of hospice care varied across Medicare, VA, and VA-Purchased care.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of administrative data for veterans aged 65 years or older who died with cancer in 2012. Multilevel logistic regression was used to evaluate the likelihood of receiving palliative care, receiving hospice care, and receiving hospice care for at least three days.
Medicare, VA, and VA-Purchased care environments.
The receipt and timing of palliative care within VA and the receipt and timing of hospice care across three healthcare environments.
Most veterans received hospice care (71%), whereas fewer received palliative care (52%). Among all cancer decedents, 59% received hospice care for their last three days of life. Patients who received hospice care did so a median of 20 days before death (interquartile range [IQR]: 7-46). Patients who received palliative care did so a median of 38 days before death (IQR: 13-94). Adjusted analyses revealed significant differences in receipt of palliative care across cancer type, and significant differences in receipt of hospice care across cancer type. After adjusting for age and cancer type, patients who received VA hospice care were significantly less likely to receive it for at least three days compared with patients who received VA-Purchased or Medicare hospice care.
There remains a gap between recommended timing of supportive services and real-world practice of care. Results suggest that difficulties in prognosticating death are not fully responsible for underexposure to hospice.
专业协会建议晚期癌症患者尽早接受姑息治疗并接受临终关怀。
我们试图了解实际的护理情况,特别是姑息治疗的时机,以及临终关怀的时机和持续时间在医疗保险、退伍军人事务部(VA)和VA购买的护理之间如何变化。
我们对2012年死于癌症的65岁及以上退伍军人的行政数据进行了回顾性分析。采用多水平逻辑回归来评估接受姑息治疗、接受临终关怀以及接受至少三天临终关怀的可能性。
医疗保险、VA和VA购买的护理环境。
VA内姑息治疗的接受情况和时机,以及三种医疗环境中临终关怀的接受情况和时机。
大多数退伍军人接受了临终关怀(71%),而接受姑息治疗的较少(52%)。在所有癌症死者中,59%在生命的最后三天接受了临终关怀。接受临终关怀的患者在死亡前中位时间为20天(四分位间距[IQR]:7 - 46)。接受姑息治疗的患者在死亡前中位时间为38天(IQR:13 - 94)。调整分析显示,不同癌症类型在接受姑息治疗方面存在显著差异,不同癌症类型在接受临终关怀方面也存在显著差异。在调整年龄和癌症类型后,与接受VA购买或医疗保险临终关怀的患者相比,接受VA临终关怀的患者接受至少三天临终关怀的可能性显著降低。
支持性服务的推荐时机与实际护理情况之间仍存在差距。结果表明,死亡预后困难并非临终关怀暴露不足的全部原因。