• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荧光偏振免疫分析法与高效液相色谱法测定血清中茶碱的比较。

Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay and HPLC for the determination of theophylline in serum.

作者信息

el-Sayed Y M, Islam S I

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 1989 Apr;14(2):127-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1989.tb00231.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2710.1989.tb00231.x
PMID:2722976
Abstract

Theophylline in serum was measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Within-run precision studies using control samples in the subtherapeutic, therapeutic and toxic concentrations, resulted in coefficients of variation in the range of 2.86-3.12% (FPIA) and 2.1-3.66% (HPLC), respectively. Between-run precision ranged from 2.76-6.2% for FPIA and from 2.51-6.0% for HPLC. The mean recovery for three spiked controls was 98.9% for FPIA and 98.8% for HPLC. Comparison of 60 patients' samples, assayed with both methods, indicated an extremely good analytical correlation (r = 0.990). The FPIA method displayed a slight but consistent positive bias in relation to the concentration of theophylline present in patients sera. Caffeine was found to exhibit a positive bias to 13%, over a caffeine concentration range of 10-40 micrograms/ml. The HPLC method offers an advantage for measurements of both caffeine and theophylline simultaneously. The FPIA offers significant advantages in speed of analysis and turnover-time, while maintaining accuracy and precision compared with those of established HPLC procedures.

摘要

采用荧光偏振免疫分析法(FPIA)和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定血清中的茶碱。使用亚治疗浓度、治疗浓度和中毒浓度的对照样品进行批内精密度研究,结果FPIA的变异系数范围为2.86 - 3.12%,HPLC的变异系数范围为2.1 - 3.66%。FPIA的批间精密度范围为2.76 - 6.2%,HPLC的批间精密度范围为2.51 - 6.0%。三种加标对照品的平均回收率FPIA为98.9%,HPLC为98.8%。用两种方法检测60例患者样本的比较表明,分析相关性非常好(r = 0.990)。FPIA方法相对于患者血清中茶碱的浓度显示出轻微但一致的正偏差。发现在10 - 40微克/毫升的咖啡因浓度范围内,咖啡因存在13%的正偏差。HPLC方法在同时测定咖啡因和茶碱方面具有优势。与既定的HPLC程序相比,FPIA在分析速度和周转时间方面具有显著优势,同时保持了准确性和精密度。

相似文献

1
Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay and HPLC for the determination of theophylline in serum.荧光偏振免疫分析法与高效液相色谱法测定血清中茶碱的比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1989 Apr;14(2):127-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1989.tb00231.x.
2
Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay and high performance liquid chromatography for the quantitative determination of phenytoin, phenobarbitone and carbamazepine in serum.荧光偏振免疫分析法与高效液相色谱法用于血清中苯妥英、苯巴比妥和卡马西平定量测定的比较。
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1986 Aug;38(8):572-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1986.tb03083.x.
3
Evaluation of a mouse monoclonal antibody for the determination of serum theophylline by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.
Ther Drug Monit. 1985;7(3):355-7. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198507030-00022.
4
Comparison of high pressure liquid chromatography and fluorescence polarization immunoassay methods in a theophylline pharmacokinetic study.
Ther Drug Monit. 1985;7(4):442-6. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198512000-00014.
5
Determination of N-desmethylmethsuximide serum concentrations using enzyme-multiplied and fluorescence polarization immunoassays.采用酶放大免疫测定技术和荧光偏振免疫分析法测定N-去甲基甲琥胺血清浓度。
Ther Drug Monit. 1989;11(3):337-42. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198905000-00018.
6
Clinical evaluation of the Abbott TDx fluorescence polarization immunoassay analyzer.雅培TDx荧光偏振免疫分析分析仪的临床评估。
Ther Drug Monit. 1984;6(3):360-7. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198409000-00018.
7
Clinical application of the Biotrack 516 system for determination of theophylline by a turbidimetric latex agglutination inhibition reaction.
Ther Drug Monit. 1996 Feb;18(1):86-91. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199602000-00014.
8
Determination of theophylline in saliva, using fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA).
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1985 Nov;23(11):725-32. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1985.23.11.725.
9
Comparison of particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay and fluorescence polarization immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies for theophylline.
Ther Drug Monit. 1986;8(2):228-31. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198606000-00019.
10
A clinical trial for therapeutic drug monitoring using microchip-based fluorescence polarization immunoassay.一种基于微芯片的荧光偏振免疫分析的治疗药物监测的临床试验。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011 Oct;401(7):2301-5. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5304-9. Epub 2011 Aug 13.