Santa-Ana-Tellez Yared, Mantel-Teeuwisse Aukje K, Leufkens Hubert G M, Wirtz Veronika J
WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy & Regulation, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Nov;31(9):1291-6. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw066. Epub 2016 May 26.
We evaluated changes in the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), non-opioid analgesics and cough and cold medicines and its relation with the use of antibiotics after the over-the-counter (OTC) antibiotic sales restrictions in Mexico and Brazil. IMS Health provided retail quarterly data from the private sectors in Mexico and Brazil from the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2013. Data of each active substance of antibiotics, easily accessible medicines perceived as antibiotics substitutes (cough and cold medicines, analgesics and NSAIDs-the latter two being combined in the analyses), and medicines to control for external factors that can affect the medicines usage trend (antihypertensives) were converted from kilograms to defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants days (DDD/TID). Interrupted time series were used to estimate changes in level of medicines use at the intervention point and slope after the regulation. The Gregory-Hansen cointegration test was used to explore the relation between the use of antibiotics and perceived substitutes. After the regulation in Mexico NSAIDs-analgesics usage level increased by 1.1 DDD/TID with a slope increase of 0.2 DDD/TID per quarter and the cough and cold medicines usage level increased by 0.4 DDD/TID. In Brazil NSAIDs-analgesics usage level increased by 1.9 DDD/TID, and cough and cold medicines did not change. In the two countries, NSAIDs-analgesics usage changes were related with antibiotic usage changes; in Mexico cough and cold medicines usage changes had a relation with the antibiotics usage changes. These results showed a substitution effect on the use of other medicines, especially NSAIDs and analgesics, after reinforcement of OTC antibiotics sales restrictions. These regulations aimed to improve the antibiotics use and as a consequence reduce antimicrobial resistance; however, this type of policies should be comprehensive and take into account the potential substitution effects on the use of other medicines.
我们评估了在墨西哥和巴西实施非处方(OTC)抗生素销售限制后,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、非阿片类镇痛药以及止咳感冒药的使用变化及其与抗生素使用的关系。艾美仕市场研究公司提供了2007年第一季度至2013年第一季度墨西哥和巴西私营部门的零售季度数据。抗生素每种活性物质、被视为抗生素替代品的易获取药物(止咳感冒药、镇痛药和NSAIDs,后两者在分析中合并)以及用于控制可能影响药物使用趋势的外部因素的药物(抗高血压药)的数据从千克转换为每1000居民日的限定日剂量(DDD/TID)。采用中断时间序列来估计干预点处药物使用水平的变化以及监管后的斜率。使用格雷戈里 - 汉森协整检验来探究抗生素使用与感知替代品之间的关系。在墨西哥实施监管后,NSAIDs - 镇痛药的使用水平增加了1.1 DDD/TID,斜率每季度增加0.2 DDD/TID,止咳感冒药的使用水平增加了0.4 DDD/TID。在巴西NSAIDs - 镇痛药的使用水平增加了1.9 DDD/TID,止咳感冒药没有变化。在这两个国家,NSAIDs - 镇痛药的使用变化与抗生素使用变化相关;在墨西哥,止咳感冒药的使用变化与抗生素使用变化相关。这些结果表明,在加强OTC抗生素销售限制后,对其他药物的使用产生了替代效应,尤其是NSAIDs和镇痛药。这些规定旨在改善抗生素的使用,从而降低抗菌药物耐药性;然而,这类政策应该是全面的,并应考虑到对其他药物使用的潜在替代效应。