Poteat G M, Cope J G, Choate C, Grossnickle W F
Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858.
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Mar;45(2):324-30. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198903)45:2<324::aid-jclp2270450222>3.0.co;2-7.
This study examined differences between conjugally abused and nonabused female employees at a state-supported ICF/MR residential facility in relation to the potential for client abuse, absenteeism rates, and performance ratings. The research was conducted at a rural institution for mentally retarded persons at which approximately 72% of the workforce was female. A survey package composed of demographic questions, the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (Milner, 1980), and other self-report questions that concerned abuse was distributed to all permanent female employees. The survey return rate was 31.7%. Analysis of the data indicated a significant difference between CAP scores for emotionally and physically abused women and their nonabused counterparts (p less than .01). When a CAP score of 215 was used as a cut-off, 44% of the abused women were classified into the potential abuser category. No significant differences were revealed between categories of abuse and measures of absenteeism or performance appraisal scores.
本研究调查了一家由国家资助的ICF/MR寄宿机构中遭受配偶虐待和未受虐待的女性员工在虐待客户可能性、缺勤率和绩效评级方面的差异。该研究在一家为智障人士设立的农村机构进行,该机构约72%的员工为女性。一份由人口统计学问题、儿童虐待潜在性量表(米尔纳,1980年)以及其他与虐待相关的自我报告问题组成的调查问卷被分发给了所有长期女性员工。调查回复率为31.7%。数据分析表明,遭受情感和身体虐待的女性与未受虐待的女性在儿童虐待潜在性量表得分上存在显著差异(p小于0.01)。当以215分的儿童虐待潜在性量表得分作为临界值时,44%受虐待女性被归类为潜在施虐者类别。在虐待类别与缺勤措施或绩效评估得分之间未发现显著差异。