• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术切除及超声引导下真空辅助切除后良性叶状肿瘤的复发率

Recurrence Rates of Benign Phyllodes Tumors After Surgical Excision and Ultrasonography-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision.

作者信息

Kim Ga Ram, Kim Eun-Kyung, Yoon Jung Hyun, Kim Min Jung, Moon Hee Jung

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ultrasound Q. 2016 Jun;32(2):151-6. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000178.

DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000178
PMID:27233071
Abstract

The recurrence rates of benign phyllodes tumors diagnosed through surgery and ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (US-VAE) were evaluated. A total of 146 benign phyllodes tumors diagnosed by surgery (n = 126) or US-VAE (n = 20) in 144 patients who had further follow-up after surgery or US-VAE were included (median follow-up period, 32.3 months; range, 6.7-142.5 months). Comparisons of recurrence rate, interval to recurrence, patient age, initial tumor size, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category, or follow-up interval were performed between the surgery and VAE groups and between groups with and without recurrence. Three cases (2.1%, 3/146) had recurrence and all were in the surgery group (2.4%, 3/126). The surgery group demonstrated larger size than the VAE group (median, 25 vs 16 mm; P < 0.001). The median age of women in the surgery group was older than those in the VAE group (39 vs 33 years, P = 0.509). The median age of women with recurrence (n = 3) was older than those without recurrence (n = 143, 49 vs 38 years, P = 0.023). In conclusion, when benign phyllodes tumor is unexpectedly diagnosed at US-VAE, if there is no residual lesion at US, clinical follow-up rather than further surgery might be recommended.

摘要

评估了通过手术及超声引导下真空辅助切除术(US-VAE)诊断的良性叶状肿瘤的复发率。纳入了144例在手术或US-VAE后进行进一步随访的患者,这些患者中共有146个良性叶状肿瘤通过手术(n = 126)或US-VAE(n = 20)诊断(中位随访期为32.3个月;范围为6.7 - 142.5个月)。对手术组和VAE组之间以及有复发和无复发组之间的复发率、复发间隔、患者年龄、初始肿瘤大小、乳腺影像报告和数据系统分类或随访间隔进行了比较。3例(2.1%,3/146)出现复发,均在手术组(2.4%,3/126)。手术组的肿瘤大小大于VAE组(中位值,25对16 mm;P < 0.001)。手术组女性的中位年龄大于VAE组(39对33岁,P = 0.509)。复发患者(n = 3)的中位年龄大于未复发患者(n = 143,49对38岁,P = 0.023)。总之,当在US-VAE时意外诊断出良性叶状肿瘤,如果超声检查没有残留病变,可能建议进行临床随访而非进一步手术。

相似文献

1
Recurrence Rates of Benign Phyllodes Tumors After Surgical Excision and Ultrasonography-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision.手术切除及超声引导下真空辅助切除后良性叶状肿瘤的复发率
Ultrasound Q. 2016 Jun;32(2):151-6. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000178.
2
Phyllodes tumor diagnosed after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision: should it be followed by surgical excision?超声引导下真空辅助切除术后诊断为叶状肿瘤:是否应继以手术切除?
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Mar;41(3):741-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.11.004. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
3
[Effect of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision verus open surgery for benign phyllodes tumors of breast on postoperative local recurrence].超声引导下真空辅助切除术与开放式手术治疗乳腺良性叶状肿瘤对术后局部复发的影响
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 1;58(2):110-113. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2020.02.007.
4
Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excisional biopsy to treat benign phyllodes tumors.超声引导下真空辅助切除活检治疗良性叶状肿瘤。
Breast. 2020 Feb;49:242-245. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Recurrence Rates and Characteristics of Phyllodes Tumors Diagnosed by Ultrasound-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy (VABB).超声引导下真空辅助乳腺活检(VABB)诊断的叶状肿瘤的复发率及特征
Anticancer Res. 2018 Sep;38(9):5481-5487. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12881.
6
Benign Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast Diagnosed After Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy: Surgical Excision or Wait-and-Watch?超声引导下真空辅助活检后诊断的乳腺良性叶状肿瘤:手术切除还是观察等待?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1129-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4990-5. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
7
Percutaneous removal of benign phyllodes tumor of the breast: An alternative to surgery.经皮穿刺切除乳腺良性叶状肿瘤:手术的替代方法
Breast J. 2018 Nov;24(6):1035-1037. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13122. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
US-guided vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision for management of benign papilloma without atypia diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy.US 引导下真空辅助经皮切除治疗 US 引导下 14 号针芯活检诊断为无不典型良性乳头瘤。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):922-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2033-4. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
9
High-Risk Breast Lesions Diagnosed by Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision.超声引导下真空辅助切除诊断的高危乳腺病变
World J Surg. 2023 May;47(5):1247-1252. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06930-9. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
Benign Breast Papilloma without Atypia: Outcomes of Surgical Excision versus US-guided Directional Vacuum-assisted Removal or US Follow-up.非典型性乳腺良性乳头状瘤:手术切除与超声引导下定向真空辅助切除或超声随访的结果。
Radiology. 2019 Oct;293(1):72-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190096. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Phyllodes tumors of the breast: Real world data from a multi-institution cohort.乳腺叶状肿瘤:来自多机构队列的真实世界数据。
Breast. 2025 May 6;82:104491. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104491.
2
Vacuum-assisted excision: a safe minimally invasive option for benign phyllodes tumor diagnosis and treatment-a systematic review and meta-analysis.真空辅助切除:一种用于乳腺叶状肿瘤诊断和治疗的安全微创选择——系统评价与Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2024 May 14;14:1394116. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1394116. eCollection 2024.
3
[GMIA-Breast Oncoplastic and Reconstruction Society consensus on operative standards of breast cancer surgery].
[全球乳房肿瘤整形与重建外科学会关于乳腺癌手术操作标准的共识]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023 Oct 20;43(10):1827. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.10.24.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis.真空辅助切除良性乳腺肿块的疗效和安全性:Meta 分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 17;57(11):1260. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111260.
5
Differential diagnosis between small breast phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas using artificial intelligence and ultrasound data.利用人工智能和超声数据对小乳腺叶状肿瘤和纤维腺瘤进行鉴别诊断。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 May;11(5):2052-2061. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-919.