Hartwig M G, Ganapathi A M, Osho A A, Hirji S A, Englum B R, Speicher P J, Palmer S M, Davis R D, Snyder L D
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Am J Transplant. 2016 Nov;16(11):3270-3277. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13892. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
The choice of a single or bilateral lung transplant for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is controversial, as surgical risk, long-term survival and organ allocation are competing factors. In an effort to balance risk and benefit, our center adopted a staged bilateral lung transplant approach for higher surgical risk ILD patients where the patient has a single lung transplant followed by a second single transplant at a later date. We sought to understand the surgical risk, organ allocation and early outcomes of these staged bilateral recipients as a group and in comparison to matched single and bilateral recipients. Our analysis demonstrates that staged bilateral lung transplant recipients (n = 12) have a higher lung allocation score (LAS), lower pulmonary function tests and a lower glomerular filtration rate prior to the first transplant compared to the second (p < 0.01). There was a shorter length of hospital stay for the second transplant (p = 0.02). The staged bilateral compared to the single and bilateral case-matched controls had comparable short-term survival (p = 0.20) and pulmonary function tests at 1 year. There was a higher incidence of renal injury in the conventional bilateral group compared to the single and staged bilateral groups. The staged bilateral procedure is a viable option in select ILD patients.
对于间质性肺疾病(ILD)患者,选择单肺移植还是双肺移植存在争议,因为手术风险、长期生存率和器官分配是相互竞争的因素。为了平衡风险与获益,我们中心对手术风险较高的ILD患者采用了分期双侧肺移植方法,即先进行单肺移植,之后在晚些时候再进行第二次单肺移植。我们试图了解这些分期双侧受者作为一个群体的手术风险、器官分配及早期结局,并与匹配的单侧和双侧受者进行比较。我们的分析表明,与第二次移植相比,分期双侧肺移植受者(n = 12)在首次移植前的肺分配评分(LAS)更高、肺功能测试结果更低且肾小球滤过率更低(p < 0.01)。第二次移植的住院时间更短(p = 0.02)。与单侧和双侧病例匹配对照组相比,分期双侧受者的短期生存率(p = 0.20)及1年时的肺功能测试结果相当。与单侧和分期双侧组相比,传统双侧组的肾损伤发生率更高。分期双侧手术对于特定的ILD患者是一种可行的选择。