Gonzalez P N, Pavlicev M, Mitteroecker P, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Spritz R A, Marcucio R S, Hallgrímsson B
Instituto de Genética Veterinaria, CCT-CONICET, La Plata, Argentina.
Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centre, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J Evol Biol. 2016 Sep;29(9):1737-51. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12906. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
Developmental stability and canalization describe the ability of developmental systems to minimize phenotypic variation in the face of stochastic micro-environmental effects, genetic variation and environmental influences. Canalization is the ability to minimize the effects of genetic or environmental effects, whereas developmental stability is the ability to minimize the effects of micro-environmental effects within individuals. Despite much attention, the mechanisms that underlie these two components of phenotypic robustness remain unknown. We investigated the genetic structure of phenotypic robustness in the collaborative cross (CC) mouse reference population. We analysed the magnitude of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) and among-individual variation of cranial shape in reciprocal crosses among the eight parental strains, using geometric morphometrics and a diallel analysis based on a Bayesian approach. Significant differences among genotypes were found for both measures, although they were poorly correlated at the level of individuals. An overall positive effect of inbreeding was found for both components of variation. The strain CAST/EiJ exerted a positive additive effect on FA and, to a lesser extent, among-individual variance. Sex- and other strain-specific effects were not significant. Neither FA nor among-individual variation was associated with phenotypic extremeness. Our results support the existence of genetic variation for both developmental stability and canalization. This finding is important because robustness is a key feature of developmental systems. Our finding that robustness is not related to phenotypic extremeness is consistent with theoretical work that suggests that its relationship to stabilizing selection is not straightforward.
发育稳定性和发育稳态描述了发育系统在面对随机微环境效应、遗传变异和环境影响时将表型变异最小化的能力。发育稳态是将遗传或环境效应的影响最小化的能力,而发育稳定性是将个体内部微环境效应的影响最小化的能力。尽管备受关注,但表型稳健性这两个组成部分背后的机制仍然未知。我们在协作杂交(CC)小鼠参考群体中研究了表型稳健性的遗传结构。我们使用几何形态计量学和基于贝叶斯方法的双列分析,分析了八个亲本品系相互杂交中波动不对称(FA)的大小和颅骨形状的个体间变异。两种测量方法均发现基因型之间存在显著差异,尽管在个体水平上它们的相关性较差。对于变异的两个组成部分,均发现近亲繁殖具有总体正向效应。CAST/EiJ品系对FA以及在较小程度上对个体间方差具有正向加性效应。性别和其他品系特异性效应不显著。FA和个体间变异均与表型极端性无关。我们的结果支持发育稳定性和发育稳态均存在遗传变异。这一发现很重要,因为稳健性是发育系统的关键特征。我们发现稳健性与表型极端性无关,这与理论研究结果一致,即其与稳定选择的关系并非直接明了。