Mulvey Lorna, Sinclair Amy, Selman Colin
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
J Genet Genomics. 2014 Sep 20;41(9):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
We are currently in the midst of a revolution in ageing research, with several dietary, genetic and pharmacological interventions now known to modulate ageing in model organisms. Excitingly, these interventions also appear to have beneficial effects on late-life health. For example, dietary restriction (DR) has been shown to slow the incidence of age-associated cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, cancer and brain ageing in non-human primates and has been shown to improve a range of health indices in humans. While the idea that DR's ability to extend lifespan is often thought of as being universal, studies in a range of organisms, including yeast, mice and monkeys, suggest that this may not actually be the case. The precise reasons underlying these differential effects of DR on lifespan are currently unclear, but genetic background may be an important factor in how an individual responds to DR. Similarly, recent findings also suggest that the responsiveness of mice to specific genetic or pharmacological interventions that modulate ageing may again be influenced by genetic background. Consequently, while there is a clear driver to develop interventions to improve late-life health and vitality, understanding precisely how these act in response to particular genotypes is critical if we are to translate these findings to humans. We will consider of the role of genetic background in the efficacy of various lifespan interventions and discuss potential routes of utilising genetic heterogeneity to further understand how particular interventions modulate lifespan and healthspan.
我们目前正处于衰老研究的一场革命之中,现在已知有几种饮食、基因和药物干预措施可调节模式生物的衰老过程。令人兴奋的是,这些干预措施似乎对晚年健康也有有益影响。例如,饮食限制(DR)已被证明可减缓非人灵长类动物中与年龄相关的心血管疾病、代谢疾病、癌症和脑衰老的发生率,并已被证明可改善人类的一系列健康指标。虽然人们通常认为DR延长寿命的能力是普遍适用的,但对包括酵母、小鼠和猴子在内的一系列生物体的研究表明,实际情况可能并非如此。目前尚不清楚DR对寿命产生这些不同影响的具体原因,但基因背景可能是个体对DR反应方式的一个重要因素。同样,最近的研究结果还表明,小鼠对调节衰老的特定基因或药物干预的反应性可能再次受到基因背景的影响。因此,虽然有一个明确的驱动力促使人们开发改善晚年健康和活力的干预措施,但如果我们要将这些研究结果应用于人类,精确了解这些干预措施如何针对特定基因型起作用至关重要。我们将考虑基因背景在各种寿命干预措施疗效中的作用,并讨论利用基因异质性进一步了解特定干预措施如何调节寿命和健康寿命的潜在途径。