• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服Xa因子抑制剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的安全性和有效性:II期和III期随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Safety and efficacy of oral factor-Xa inhibitors versus Vitamin K antagonist in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Garg Jalaj, Chaudhary Rahul, Krishnamoorthy Parasuram, Palaniswamy Chandrasekar, Shah Neeraj, Bozorgnia Babak, Natale Andrea

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, United States.

Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:235-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.059. Epub 2016 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.059
PMID:27236121
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aim of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy on factor-Xa inhibitors (FXIs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) as compared to Vitamin K antagonist (VKA).

METHODS

Phase II and III randomized controlled trials that reported clinical safety and efficacy of FXI in patients with NVAF were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through December 10, 2015. The primary safety outcome of our study was composite of stroke and systemic embolic event. Secondary outcomes studied were individual endpoints of primary safety outcome, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleed (CRNMB), and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We included 11 RCTs with a total of 59,164 participants, of which 34,231 patients received oral FXI and 24,933 patients were on VKA with a mean follow-up of 369days. There was a significant reduction in primary outcome with FXI compared to VKA, 1,112 (3.4%) versus 816 (3.6%) events, respectively (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.99). Use of FXI significantly reduced major bleeding events compared to VKA, OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.96, test for heterogeneity (I(2)=74%). Incidence of CRNMB was not different between FXI and VKA groups, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.68-1.04. There was a significant reduction in all-cause mortality in FXI group compared to VKA group, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.94 with no significant heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Use of FXI was associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding events and all-cause mortality without increased risk of stroke or SEE compared to VKA.

摘要

背景

我们研究的目的是评估与维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)相比,非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者使用Xa因子抑制剂(FXIs)的安全性和有效性。

方法

通过检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,确定截至2015年12月10日报道FXI在NVAF患者中临床安全性和有效性的II期和III期随机对照试验。我们研究的主要安全结局是卒中与全身性栓塞事件的复合结局。研究的次要结局是主要安全结局的各个终点、大出血、临床相关非大出血(CRNMB)和全因死亡率。

结果

我们纳入了11项随机对照试验,共59164名参与者,其中34231名患者接受口服FXI,24933名患者使用VKA,平均随访369天。与VKA相比,FXI组的主要结局显著降低,分别为1112例(3.4%)和816例(3.6%)事件(OR 0.82;95%CI 0.68 - 0.99)。与VKA相比,使用FXI显著降低了大出血事件,OR 0.74,95%CI 0.58 - 0.96,异质性检验(I² = 74%)。FXI组和VKA组之间CRNMB的发生率没有差异,OR 0.84,95%CI 0.68 - 1.04。与VKA组相比,FXI组的全因死亡率显著降低,OR 0.88,95%CI 0.83 - 0.94,无显著异质性。

结论

与VKA相比,使用FXI可显著降低大出血事件和全因死亡率,且不会增加卒中或全身性栓塞事件的风险。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of oral factor-Xa inhibitors versus Vitamin K antagonist in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials.口服Xa因子抑制剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的安全性和有效性:II期和III期随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:235-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.059. Epub 2016 May 14.
2
Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.在心房颤动患者中,Xa因子抑制剂与维生素K拮抗剂预防脑栓塞或全身性栓塞的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 8(8):CD008980. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008980.pub2.
3
Uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists during catheter ablation of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.非瓣膜性心房颤动导管消融中直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂不间断治疗的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2018 Oct 1;20(10):1612-1620. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy133.
4
Meta-analysis of risk of stroke and thrombo-embolism with rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonists in ablation and cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.利伐沙班与维生素K拮抗剂用于房颤消融和复律时的卒中及血栓栓塞风险的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:345-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.323. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
5
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban and Vitamin K Antagonist Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated in Routine German Practice.阿哌沙班与维生素K拮抗剂疗法在德国常规医疗中治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的疗效和安全性比较
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Mar;27(3):390-393. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation on vitamin k antagonists or direct-acting oral anticoagulants: patients profile and long-term follow up outcomes.接受维生素K拮抗剂或直接口服抗凝剂治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者:患者概况及长期随访结果
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2019;89(4):382-392. doi: 10.24875/ACM.19000023.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Vitamin K Antagonists versus Rivaroxaban in Hemodialysis Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.维生素 K 拮抗剂与利伐沙班在血液透析伴房颤患者中的安全性和疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jun 1;32(6):1474-1483. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020111566. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
A meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials with novel oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: comparisons between direct thrombin inhibitors vs. factor Xa inhibitors and different dosing regimens.新型口服抗凝剂用于心房颤动的III期随机对照试验的荟萃分析:直接凝血酶抑制剂与Xa因子抑制剂及不同给药方案之间的比较
Thromb Res. 2014 Dec;134(6):1253-64. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
9
Comparison of the short-term risk of bleeding and arterial thromboembolic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients newly treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonists: a French nationwide propensity-matched cohort study.达比加群或利伐沙班与维生素K拮抗剂新治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者出血和动脉血栓栓塞事件短期风险的比较:一项法国全国性倾向匹配队列研究。
Circulation. 2015 Sep 29;132(13):1252-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015710. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
10
Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists for catheter ablation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.利伐沙班不间断治疗与维生素K拮抗剂不间断治疗用于非瓣膜性心房颤动导管消融的比较
Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 21;36(28):1805-11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv177. Epub 2015 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A Case of Postablation Pericardial Effusion.一例消融术后心包积液病例。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018 Oct 15;9(10):3365-3368. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.091002. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Interventions and Strategies to Improve Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.干预措施和策略以改善心房颤动患者的口服抗凝药物使用:系统评价的系统评价。
Clin Drug Investig. 2018 Jul;38(7):579-591. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0641-5.
3
Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.
在房颤患者中,Xa因子抑制剂与维生素K拮抗剂预防脑栓塞或全身性栓塞的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 6;3(3):CD008980. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008980.pub3.
4
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding with oral anticoagulants: non-major may not be trivial.口服抗凝剂相关的临床相关非大出血:非大出血可能并非微不足道。
Blood Transfus. 2018 Jul;16(4):387-391. doi: 10.2450/2017.0335-16. Epub 2017 Mar 15.