Suppr超能文献

恒河猴前额叶神经元在视觉引导的眼动准备中的参与。

Participation of prefrontal neurons in the preparation of visually guided eye movements in the rhesus monkey.

作者信息

Boch R A, Goldberg M E

机构信息

Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1989 May;61(5):1064-84. doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.61.5.1064.

Abstract
  1. We recorded from 257 neurons in the banks of the posterior third of the principal sulcus of two rhesus monkeys trained to look at a fixation point and make saccades to stimuli in the visual periphery. Sixty-six percent (220/257) discharged or were suppressed in association with one or more aspects of the tasks we used. 2. Fifty-eight percent (151/257) of the neurons responded to the appearance of a spot of light in some part of the contralateral visual field. Cells did not seem to have absolute requirements for stimulus shape, size, or direction of motion. 3. Thirty-six percent (29/79) of visually responsive neurons tested quantitatively gave an enhanced response to the stimulus in the receptive field when the monkey had to make a saccade to the stimulus when its appearance was synchronous with the disappearance of the fixation point (synchron task). Twenty-nine percent (19/57) of the neurons gave an enhanced response to the stimulus when the monkey had to make a saccade to the stimulus some time after it appeared (delayed-saccade task). In general, enhancement in the synchron task correlated well with enhancement in the delayed-saccade task. 4. Enhancement was spatially specific. It did not occur when the monkey made a saccade to a stimulus outside the receptive field even though there was a stimulus within the receptive field. 5. Twenty-three percent (27/117) of neurons studied in the delayed-saccade task gave two bursts, one at the appearance of the stimulus and a second one around the saccade. This second burst generally did not occur when the monkey made the same saccade to a remembered target, but instead required the presence of the visual stimulus, and so we describe it as a reactivation of the visual response. Reactivation was also spatially specific. 6. The latency from reactivation to the beginning of the saccade ranged from 160 ms before the saccade to the beginning of the saccade. Reactivation usually continued for several hundred milliseconds after the saccade, sometimes for the duration of the trial. 7. Reactivation and enhancement are not the same mechanism. Although some cells showed both phenomena there was no correlation between enhancement and reactivation. 8. Cells that showed reactivation in the saccade task also showed reactivation at a weaker level in a suppressed-saccade task. In this task the monkeys had to hold fixation despite the disappearance of the fixation point and the continued presence of the peripheral stimulus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 我们记录了两只恒河猴主沟后三分之一区域脑岸中的257个神经元的活动,这两只猴子经过训练,需注视一个固定点,并对视觉周边的刺激做出扫视动作。66%(220/257)的神经元在与我们所使用任务的一个或多个方面相关时会放电或受到抑制。2. 58%(151/257)的神经元对同侧视野某个部分出现的光点有反应。细胞对刺激形状、大小或运动方向似乎没有绝对要求。3. 在定量测试的视觉反应神经元中,当猴子必须在光点出现且与固定点消失同步时对其做出扫视动作(同步任务),36%(29/79)的神经元对感受野中的刺激反应增强。当猴子必须在光点出现一段时间后对其做出扫视动作(延迟扫视任务),29%(19/57)的神经元对刺激反应增强。总体而言,同步任务中的增强与延迟扫视任务中的增强密切相关。4. 增强具有空间特异性。当猴子对感受野之外的刺激做出扫视动作时,即使感受野内有刺激,增强也不会发生。5. 在延迟扫视任务中研究的神经元有23%(27/117)出现两次放电,一次在刺激出现时,另一次在扫视动作前后。当猴子对记忆中的目标做出相同扫视动作时,第二次放电通常不会出现,而是需要视觉刺激的存在,所以我们将其描述为视觉反应的重新激活。重新激活也具有空间特异性。6. 从重新激活到扫视动作开始的潜伏期在扫视动作开始前从160毫秒到扫视动作开始的时间范围内。重新激活通常在扫视动作后持续几百毫秒,有时会持续整个试验过程。7. 重新激活和增强不是相同的机制。尽管有些细胞同时表现出这两种现象,但增强和重新激活之间没有相关性。8. 在扫视任务中表现出重新激活的细胞,在抑制扫视任务中也会以较弱的水平表现出重新激活。在这个任务中,尽管固定点消失且周边刺激持续存在,猴子仍必须保持注视。(摘要截断于400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验