Suppr超能文献

猕猴外侧顶内沟区的运动意图活动。I. 运动计划与感觉记忆的分离。

Motor intention activity in the macaque's lateral intraparietal area. I. Dissociation of motor plan from sensory memory.

作者信息

Mazzoni P, Bracewell R M, Barash S, Andersen R A

机构信息

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):1439-56. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.3.1439.

Abstract
  1. The lateral intraparietal area (area LIP) of the monkey's posterior parietal cortex (PPC) contains neurons that are active during saccadic eye movements. These neurons' activity includes visual and saccade-related components. These responses are spatially tuned and the location of a neuron's visual receptive field (RF) relative to the fovea generally overlaps its preferred saccade amplitude and direction (i.e., its motor field, MF). When a delay is imposed between the presentation of a visual stimulus and a saccade made to its location (memory saccade task), many LIP neurons maintain elevated activity during the delay (memory activity, M), which appears to encode the metrics of the next intended saccadic eye movements. Recent studies have alternatively suggested that LIP neurons encode the locations of visual stimuli regardless of where the animal intends to look. We examined whether the M activity of LIP neurons specifically encodes movement intention or the locations of recent visual stimuli, or a combination of both. In the accompanying study, we investigated whether the intended-movement activity reflects changes in motor plan. 2. We trained monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to memorize the locations of two visual stimuli and plan a sequence of two saccades, one to each remembered target, as we recorded the activity of single LIP neurons. Two targets were flashed briefly while the monkey maintained fixation; after a delay the fixation point was extinguished, and the monkey made two saccades in sequence to each target's remembered location, in the order in which the targets were presented. This "delayed double saccade" (DDS) paradigm allowed us to dissociate the location of visual stimulation from the direction of the planned saccade and thus distinguish neuronal activity related to the target's location from activity related to the saccade plan. By imposing a delay, we eliminated the confounding effect of any phasic responses coincident with the appearance of the stimulus and with the saccade. 3. We arranged the two visual stimuli so that in one set of conditions at least the first one was in the neuron's visual RF, and thus the first saccade was in the neuron's motor field (MF). M activity should be high in these conditions according to both the sensory memory and motor plan hypotheses. In another set of conditions, the second stimulus appeared in the RF but the first one was presented outside the RF, instructing the monkey to plan the first saccade away from the neuron's MF. If the M activity encodes the motor plan, it should be low in these conditions, reflecting the plan for the first saccade (away from the MF). If it is a sensory trace of the stimulus' location, it should be high, reflecting stimulation of the RF by the second target. 4. We tested 49 LIP neurons (in 3 hemispheres of 2 monkeys) with M activity on the DDS task. Of these, 38 (77%) had M activity related to the next intended saccade. They were active in the delay period, as expected, if the first saccade was in their preferred direction. They were less active or silent if the next saccade was not in their preferred direction, even when the second stimulus appeared in their RF. 5. The M activity of 8 (16%) of the remaining neurons specifically encoded the location of the most recent visual stimulus. Their firing rate during the delay reflected stimulation of the RF independently of the saccade being planned. The remaining 3 neurons had M activity that did not consistently encode either the next saccade or the stimulus' location. 6. We also recorded the activity of a subset of neurons (n = 38) in a condition in which no stimulus appeared in a neuron's RF, but the second saccade was in the neuron's MF. In this case the majority of neurons tested (23/38, 60%) became active in the period between the first and second saccade, even if neither stimulus had appeared in their RF. Moreover, this activity appeared only after the first saccade had started in all but two of
摘要
  1. 猴子后顶叶皮质(PPC)的外侧顶内区(LIP区)包含在眼球扫视运动期间活跃的神经元。这些神经元的活动包括视觉和与扫视相关的成分。这些反应在空间上是有调谐的,并且神经元的视觉感受野(RF)相对于中央凹的位置通常与其偏好的扫视幅度和方向(即其运动野,MF)重叠。当在视觉刺激呈现和向其位置进行扫视之间施加延迟时(记忆扫视任务),许多LIP神经元在延迟期间保持活动增强(记忆活动,M),这似乎编码了下一次预期眼球扫视运动的指标。最近的研究则表明,LIP神经元编码视觉刺激的位置,而不管动物打算看向何处。我们研究了LIP神经元的M活动是专门编码运动意图还是最近视觉刺激的位置,或者是两者的结合。在随附的研究中,我们调查了预期运动活动是否反映了运动计划的变化。2. 我们训练猕猴(恒河猴)记住两个视觉刺激的位置,并计划一系列两个扫视,每个扫视指向一个记住的目标,同时记录单个LIP神经元的活动。当猴子保持注视时,两个目标短暂闪烁;延迟后注视点熄灭,猴子按目标呈现的顺序依次向每个目标的记住位置进行两个扫视。这种“延迟双扫视”(DDS)范式使我们能够将视觉刺激的位置与计划扫视的方向分离,从而区分与目标位置相关的神经元活动和与扫视计划相关的活动。通过施加延迟,我们消除了与刺激出现和扫视同时发生的任何相位反应的混淆效应。3. 我们安排两个视觉刺激,使得在一组条件下至少第一个刺激在神经元的视觉RF内,因此第一个扫视在神经元的运动野(MF)内。根据感觉记忆和运动计划假设,在这些条件下M活动应该很高。在另一组条件下,第二个刺激出现在RF内,但第一个刺激呈现在RF外,指示猴子计划第一个扫视远离神经元的MF。如果M活动编码运动计划,在这些条件下它应该很低,反映第一个扫视(远离MF)的计划。如果它是刺激位置的感觉痕迹,它应该很高,反映第二个目标对RF的刺激。4. 我们在DDS任务中测试了49个具有M活动的LIP神经元(来自2只猴子的3个半球)。其中,38个(77%)具有与下一次预期扫视相关的M活动。如果第一个扫视在它们的偏好方向上,它们在延迟期如预期那样活跃。如果下一次扫视不在它们的偏好方向上,即使第二个刺激出现在它们的RF内,它们也不太活跃或沉默。5. 其余8个(16%)神经元的M活动专门编码最近视觉刺激的位置。它们在延迟期间的放电率反映了RF的刺激,与计划的扫视无关。其余3个神经元的M活动既没有一致地编码下一次扫视也没有编码刺激的位置。6. 我们还在一种条件下记录了一部分神经元(n = 38)的活动,在这种条件下没有刺激出现在神经元的RF内,但第二个扫视在神经元的MF内。在这种情况下,大多数测试的神经元(23/38,60%)在第一个和第二个扫视之间的时间段变得活跃,即使两个刺激都没有出现在它们的RF内。此外,除了两个神经元外,这种活动仅在第一个扫视开始后出现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验