Hsieh Suh-Ing, Hsu Li-Ling, Huang Tzu-Hsin
Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, No. 236, 10th Floor-3, Fusing 1st Road, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 33375, Taiwan, ROC.
Health Allied Education, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science, Taiwan, ROC.
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jul;42:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
Baccalaureate nursing students perceive research as unattractive, doubt the value of nursing research, and do not appreciate the link of research with practice. No studies have examined students' cognitive load during an evidence-based practice research course versus a traditional research course.
To assess the effect of integrating constructivist theories and evidence-based practice on student cognitive load and learning performance in a research course.
A true experimental study.
A Registered Nurse-to-Bachelor of Science in Nursing program.
Six classes of second-year students.
Students were randomly allocated to the control group (two classes) or the experimental group (two classes) using cluster randomization. The control group underwent "traditional research"; the experimental group experienced "integrating evidence-based practice into research." Instruments for outcome assessment include the Cognitive Load Scale, cognitive test, team critique paper, and qualitative feedback on course satisfaction. The between-subjects effects were compared by Analysis of Covariance.
The experimental group had significantly higher mental load (8.74 vs. 7.27, p<.001), mental effort (11.07 vs. 10.07, p=.009), mental efficiency (0.33 vs. -0.31, p<.001), and research knowledge (70.61 vs. 44.92, p<.001) than the control group. The experimental group had better critique paper scores in introduction (92.80%), literature review (91.70%), and assignment requirement and writing (89.40%). Some experimental learners expressed satisfaction with learning evidence-based practice (17.78%) and critiquing a research article (7.78%).
Integrating evidence-based practice into a research course not only improved the research knowledge of baccalaureate nursing students, but also increased their mental load, mental effort, and mental efficiency. Additional studies may track learners' responses to different learning systems using the developed instrument to measure the three types of cognitive load. These findings may help educators design more effective and interesting curricula for integrating research and evidence-based practice into the studies of student nurses.
护理学本科学生认为研究缺乏吸引力,怀疑护理研究的价值,且不理解研究与实践的联系。尚无研究考察过在循证实践研究课程与传统研究课程中,学生的认知负荷情况。
评估在研究课程中整合建构主义理论和循证实践对学生认知负荷及学习表现的影响。
一项真实验研究。
一个从注册护士到护理学理学学士的项目。
六组二年级学生。
采用整群随机化将学生随机分为对照组(两组)和实验组(两组)。对照组接受“传统研究”;实验组体验“将循证实践融入研究”。用于结果评估的工具包括认知负荷量表、认知测试、团队评论文章以及关于课程满意度的定性反馈。通过协方差分析比较组间效应。
实验组的心理负荷(8.74对7.27,p<0.001)、心理努力程度(11.07对10.07,p = 0.009)、心理效率(0.33对 -0.31,p<0.001)和研究知识(70.61对44.92,p<0.001)均显著高于对照组。实验组在评论文章的引言(92.80%)、文献综述(91.70%)以及任务要求和写作(89.40%)方面得分更高。一些参与实验的学习者对学习循证实践(17.78%)和评论一篇研究文章(7.78%)表示满意。
将循证实践融入研究课程不仅提高了护理学本科学生的研究知识,还增加了他们的心理负荷、心理努力程度和心理效率。后续研究可以使用所开发的工具来测量三种类型的认知负荷,追踪学习者对不同学习系统的反应。这些发现可能有助于教育工作者设计更有效且有趣的课程,以便将研究和循证实践融入护理专业学生的学习中。