Peterhans E, von der Heydt R
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
J Neurosci. 1989 May;9(5):1749-63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-05-01749.1989.
We have studied the mechanism of contour perception by recording from neurons in the visual cortex of alert rhesus monkeys. We used stimuli in which human observers perceive anomalous contours: A moving pair of notches in 2 bright rectangles mimicked an overlaying dark bar. For control, the notches were closed by thin lines so that the anomalous contours disappeared or half of the figure was blanked, with a similar effect. Orientation-selective neurons were studied. With the receptive fields centered in the gap, 23 of 72 (32%) neurons tested in area V2 responded to the moving "bar" even though the stimulus spared their response fields, and when the notches were closed, their responses were reduced or abolished. Likewise, when half of the figure was removed, the neurons usually failed to respond. Neurons with receptive fields within 4 degrees of the fovea signaled anomalous contours bridging gaps of 1 degree-3.5 degrees. The anomalous-contour responses were compared quantitatively with response field profiles and length-summation curves and found to exceed the predictions by linear-summation and summation-to-threshold models. Summation models also fail to explain the effect of closing lines which add only negligible amounts of light. In V1, only one of 26 neurons tested showed comparable responses, and only with a narrow gap. The others responded only when the stimulus invaded the response field and did not show the effect of closing lines, or failed to respond at all. The contour responses in V2, the nonadditivity, and the effect of closure can be explained by the previously proposed model (Peterhans et al., 1986), assuming that the corners excite end-stopped fields orthogonal to the contour whose signals are pooled in the contour neurons.
我们通过记录清醒恒河猴视觉皮层中的神经元活动,研究了轮廓感知的机制。我们使用了人类观察者能感知到异常轮廓的刺激:两个明亮矩形中的一对移动缺口模拟了一条叠加的暗条。作为对照,缺口用细线封闭,这样异常轮廓就消失了,或者图形的一半被遮挡,效果类似。我们研究了方向选择性神经元。在V2区域测试的72个神经元中,有23个(32%)其感受野位于缺口中心,它们对移动的“条”有反应,尽管刺激避开了它们的反应区域,而当缺口被封闭时,它们的反应减弱或消失。同样,当图形的一半被移除时,这些神经元通常不再有反应。在中央凹4度范围内有感受野的神经元发出了跨越1度至3.5度缺口的异常轮廓信号。将异常轮廓反应与反应区域轮廓和长度总和曲线进行了定量比较,发现其超出了线性总和模型和总和至阈值模型的预测。总和模型也无法解释封闭线条的效果,因为封闭线条只增加了可忽略不计的光量。在V1区域,测试的26个神经元中只有一个表现出类似的反应,而且只有在缺口很窄时才会出现。其他神经元只有在刺激侵入反应区域时才有反应,没有表现出封闭线条的效果,或者根本没有反应。V2区域的轮廓反应、非叠加性以及封闭效果可以用先前提出的模型(Peterhans等人,1986年)来解释,假设角点激发了与轮廓正交的终端停止场,其信号在轮廓神经元中汇聚。