• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文献计量数据是否反映了研究的推广?对德国卓越计划资助的卓越集群中高被引论文的网络分析。

Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany.

作者信息

Bornmann Lutz

机构信息

Division for Science and Innovation Studies, Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society, Hofgartenstr. 8, 80539 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Scientometrics. 2016;107:1041-1061. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1925-2. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1007/s11192-016-1925-2
PMID:27239077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4865529/
Abstract

Under the Excellence Initiative, a number of Clusters of Excellence in Germany have been supported since 2006 and 2007-including each a limited number of cooperating institutions. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether support for Clusters of Excellence since 2006 and 2007 is reflected in bibliometric network data. For this purpose, a comparison is made between network data in the period before support started (2003-2005) and in the period after support started (2009-2011). For these two periods, a co-authorship network is generated (based on the funded institutions). This is based on publications which are among the 1 % most frequently cited publications in their respective fields and publication year and which have at least one author from Germany. As the results show, the outcomes this yields for life sciences and natural sciences differ from each other. Whereas natural sciences display an effect of establishment of Clusters of Excellence on the bibliometric networks, this was not true of life sciences. After establishment of the Clusters of Excellence, the network in natural sciences not only contained more institutions of a Cluster of Excellence, but these institutions were distributed across fewer bibliometric clusters in the network than before establishment. In other words the structure of the Clusters of Excellence was better reflected in the network.

摘要

在卓越计划下,自2006年和2007年以来,德国的一些卓越集群得到了支持,每个卓越集群都包括数量有限的合作机构。本研究的目的是调查自2006年和2007年以来对卓越集群的支持是否反映在文献计量网络数据中。为此,对支持开始前(2003 - 2005年)和支持开始后(2009 - 2011年)这两个时期的网络数据进行了比较。对于这两个时期,生成了一个共同作者网络(基于受资助机构)。这是基于在各自领域和出版年份中被引用频率最高的1%的出版物,并且这些出版物至少有一位来自德国的作者。结果表明,生命科学和自然科学的结果彼此不同。自然科学显示出卓越集群的建立对文献计量网络有影响,而生命科学则不然。卓越集群建立后,自然科学网络不仅包含了更多卓越集群的机构,而且这些机构在网络中分布在比建立前更少的文献计量集群中。换句话说,卓越集群的结构在网络中得到了更好的体现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaa6/4865529/b662eaf0488f/11192_2016_1925_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaa6/4865529/b662eaf0488f/11192_2016_1925_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaa6/4865529/b662eaf0488f/11192_2016_1925_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany.文献计量数据是否反映了研究的推广?对德国卓越计划资助的卓越集群中高被引论文的网络分析。
Scientometrics. 2016;107:1041-1061. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1925-2. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
2
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).尿道下裂(1945 - 2013年)领域被引用次数排名前150的论文的比较文献计量分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
3
Bibliometric analysis of HRC-supported biomedical publications, 1990 to 1994.1990年至1994年由人权委员会资助的生物医学出版物的文献计量分析。
N Z Med J. 1999 Sep 24;112(1096):351-4.
4
[Scientific publications of Costa Rica in Science Citation Index bibliometric analysis of the period 1999-2001].[1999 - 2001年期间哥斯达黎加在《科学引文索引》中的科学出版物计量分析]
Rev Biol Trop. 2002 Sep-Dec;50(3-4):951-62.
5
On Track to Professorship? A Bibliometric Analysis of Early Scholarly Output.有望成为教授?早期学术成果的文献计量分析。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Mar-Apr;45(3):E119-23.
6
Social and natural sciences differ in their research strategies, adapted to work for different knowledge landscapes.社会科学和自然科学在研究策略上有所不同,这些策略是为适用于不同的知识领域而制定的。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e113901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113901. eCollection 2014.
7
The highly-cited Electrocardiogram-related articles in science citation index expanded: characteristics and hotspots.科学引文索引扩展版中高被引的心电图相关文章:特征与热点
J Electrocardiol. 2014 Sep-Oct;47(5):738-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
8
[A bibliometric investigation to research fronts of major sub-specialties in internal medicine].[一项关于内科主要亚专业研究前沿的文献计量学调查]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Feb;52(2):144-50.
9
Active research fields in anesthesia: a document co-citation analysis of the anesthetic literature.麻醉学的活跃研究领域:麻醉学文献的文献共被引分析
Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1524-33, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d18a1.
10
A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most influential papers in burns.烧伤领域100篇最具影响力论文的文献计量分析。
Burns. 2014 Feb;40(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.10.025. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence empowering rare diseases: a bibliometric perspective over the last two decades.人工智能赋能罕见病研究:过去二十年的文献计量学视角
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Sep 13;19(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03352-1.
2
A Bibliometric Review of Research on International Students' Mental Health: Science Mapping of the Literature from 1957 to 2020.国际学生心理健康研究的文献计量学综述:1957年至2020年文献的科学图谱
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Jul 21;11(3):781-794. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030056.
3
Altmetrics Attention Scores for Randomized Controlled Trials in Total Joint Arthroplasty Are Reflective of High Scientific Quality: An Altmetrics-Based Methodological Quality and Bias Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.软件综述:VOSviewer,一款用于文献计量绘图的计算机程序。
Scientometrics. 2010 Aug;84(2):523-538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
基于替代计量指标的全膝关节置换随机对照试验的关注度评分反映了高科学质量:一种替代计量指标的方法学质量和偏倚分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Dec;4(12):e20.00187. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00187.
4
Mapping of climate change research in the Arab world: a bibliometric analysis.阿拉伯世界气候变化研究的绘制:文献计量分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jan;27(3):3523-3540. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07100-y. Epub 2019 Dec 21.