• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How blockchain-timestamped protocols could improve the trustworthiness of medical science.区块链时间戳协议如何提高医学科学的可信度。
F1000Res. 2016 Feb 26;5:222. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8114.3. eCollection 2016.
2
Improving data transparency in clinical trials using blockchain smart contracts.使用区块链智能合约提高临床试验中的数据透明度。
F1000Res. 2016 Oct 20;5:2541. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9756.1. eCollection 2016.
3
Provable Data Integrity in the Pharmaceutical Industry Based on Version Control Systems and the Blockchain.基于版本控制系统和区块链的制药行业可证明的数据完整性
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2019 Jul-Aug;73(4):373-390. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2018.009407. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
RETRACTION:  How blockchain-timestamped protocols could improve the trustworthiness of medical science.撤稿声明:区块链时间戳协议如何提高医学科学的可信度。
F1000Res. 2017 Jun 8;6:805. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11888.1. eCollection 2017.
5
Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent.临床试验中的区块链协议:同意的透明度与可追溯性
F1000Res. 2017 Jan 23;6:66. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10531.5. eCollection 2017.
6
Blockchain Technology Secures Robot Swarms: A Comparison of Consensus Protocols and Their Resilience to Byzantine Robots.区块链技术保障机器人集群安全:共识协议及其对拜占庭机器人的弹性比较
Front Robot AI. 2020 May 12;7:54. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00054. eCollection 2020.
7
Data Validation and Verification Using Blockchain in a Clinical Trial for Breast Cancer: Regulatory Sandbox.在乳腺癌临床试验中使用区块链进行数据验证和核查:监管沙盒
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e18938. doi: 10.2196/18938.
8
On the Design of Blockchain-Based ECDSA With Fault-Tolerant Batch Verification Protocol for Blockchain-Enabled IoMT.基于区块链的 ECDSA 设计与区块链支持的 IoMT 的容错批量验证协议
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022 May;26(5):1977-1986. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3112693. Epub 2022 May 5.
9
Leveraging Blockchain Technology for Informed Consent Process and Patient Engagement in a Clinical Trial Pilot.在一项临床试验试点中利用区块链技术实现知情同意流程和患者参与
Blockchain Healthc Today. 2021 Oct 15;4. doi: 10.30953/bhty.v4.182. eCollection 2021.
10
Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?-A Systematic Review.区块链技术的当前研究现状如何?——一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 3;11(10):e0163477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163477. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Blockchained education: challenging the long-standing model of academic institutions.区块链教育:挑战学术机构的长期模式。
Int J Interact Des Manuf. 2022;16(2):791-802. doi: 10.1007/s12008-022-00886-1. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Scrybe: A Secure Audit Trail for Clinical Trial Data Fusion.Scrybe:临床试验数据融合的安全审计跟踪
Digit Threat. 2023 Jun;4(2). doi: 10.1145/3491258. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
The HealthChain Blockchain for Electronic Health Records: Development Study.健康链区块链电子健康记录:开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 22;23(1):e13556. doi: 10.2196/13556.
4
Privacy-Preserving in Healthcare Blockchain Systems Based on Lightweight Message Sharing.基于轻量级消息共享的医疗保健区块链系统中的隐私保护。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 29;20(7):1898. doi: 10.3390/s20071898.
5
A Decentralized Privacy-Preserving Healthcare Blockchain for IoT.物联网去中心化隐私保护医疗区块链
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 15;19(2):326. doi: 10.3390/s19020326.
6
Tamper-Resistant Mobile Health Using Blockchain Technology.使用区块链技术的防篡改移动健康应用
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Jul 26;5(7):e111. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7938.
7
Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality.用于提高临床研究质量的区块链技术。
Trials. 2017 Jul 19;18(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2035-z.
8
Improving data transparency in clinical trials using blockchain smart contracts.使用区块链智能合约提高临床试验中的数据透明度。
F1000Res. 2016 Oct 20;5:2541. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9756.1. eCollection 2016.

区块链时间戳协议如何提高医学科学的可信度。

How blockchain-timestamped protocols could improve the trustworthiness of medical science.

作者信息

Irving Greg, Holden John

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 OSR, UK.

General Practitioner, Garswood Surgery, St. Helens, Lancashire, WN4 0XD, UK.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2016 Feb 26;5:222. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8114.3. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.8114.3
PMID:27239273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4866630/
Abstract

Trust in scientific research is diminished by evidence that data are being manipulated. Outcome switching, data dredging and selective publication are some of the problems that undermine the integrity of published research. Methods for using blockchain to provide proof of pre-specified endpoints in clinical trial protocols were first reported by Carlisle. We wished to empirically test such an approach using a clinical trial protocol where outcome switching has previously been reported. Here we confirm the use of blockchain as a low cost, independently verifiable method to audit and confirm the reliability of scientific studies.

摘要

数据被操纵的证据削弱了对科学研究的信任。结果切换、数据挖掘和选择性发表是一些破坏已发表研究完整性的问题。卡莱尔首次报道了使用区块链为临床试验方案中的预先指定终点提供证明的方法。我们希望使用一个此前曾报道过结果切换的临床试验方案,对这种方法进行实证检验。在此,我们证实了区块链可作为一种低成本、可独立验证的方法,用于审核和确认科学研究的可靠性。