Suppr超能文献

[过敏原分析]

[Allergen analysis].

作者信息

Röder Martin, Weber Wolfgang

机构信息

ifp Institut für Produktqualität GmbH, Wagner-Régeny-Str. 8, 12489, Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Jul;59(7):889-99. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2370-3.

Abstract

The fundamental requirement when testing for and ensuring compliance with legally required labelling regulations is the reliable analysis of food allergens. This can be carried out by means of either DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) or protein detection. Protein detection has the advantage of directly detecting the allergenic component and can currently be carried out using immunological (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA])/lateral flow devices [LFD]) or mass spectrometry-based techniques. DNA detection is indirect, but allows the presence of food allergens to be validated through the use of another marker. Each method has its pros and cons, which have to be considered on a case-by-case basis. ELISA is quantitative, quick and easy to carry out and has high sensitivity. LFD testing is ideal for industrial applications, as the tests can be carried out on-site. Both antibody-based tests may have problems with processed foods and false positive results. Mass-spectrometric techniques show a lot of promise, but are currently still time-consuming and complex to carry out. They also run into problems with processed foods and their degree of sensitivity is matrix and parameter dependent. For these reasons, this technique is only occasionally used. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) provides the highest specificity and, depending on the target sequence, a very good to good level of sensitivity. Despite the high stability of DNA, PCR is still subject to the influence of processing and matrix related factors. Due to natural variation and production-related changes in the structures relevant in the process of detection, all methods exhibit a relatively high level of uncertainty of measurement. At present, there is no method which provides the absolute correct quantification. However, by means of laboratory-based analyses it is possible to calibrate for the allergen in question and thus be able to make reliable measurements using methods that are already available.

摘要

检测并确保符合法定标签规定的基本要求是对食品过敏原进行可靠分析。这可以通过DNA(脱氧核糖核酸)检测或蛋白质检测来实现。蛋白质检测的优点是直接检测致敏成分,目前可以使用免疫法(酶联免疫吸附测定[ELISA])/侧向流动装置[LFD])或基于质谱的技术来进行。DNA检测是间接的,但可以通过使用另一种标记物来验证食品过敏原的存在。每种方法都有其优缺点,必须根据具体情况加以考虑。ELISA是定量的、快速且易于操作的,并且具有高灵敏度。LFD检测非常适合工业应用,因为检测可以在现场进行。两种基于抗体的检测方法对于加工食品可能都存在问题以及出现假阳性结果。质谱技术显示出很大的前景,但目前仍然耗时且操作复杂。它们在加工食品方面也会遇到问题,并且其灵敏度程度取决于基质和参数。由于这些原因,这种技术只是偶尔使用。聚合酶链反应(PCR)具有最高的特异性,并且根据目标序列,灵敏度处于非常好到良好的水平。尽管DNA具有高度稳定性,但PCR仍然受到加工和基质相关因素的影响。由于在检测过程中相关结构的自然变异和与生产相关的变化,所有方法都表现出相对较高的测量不确定度。目前,没有一种方法能够提供绝对正确的定量。然而,通过基于实验室的分析,可以针对所讨论的过敏原进行校准,从而能够使用现有方法进行可靠的测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验