Foisy Arnaud, Kapoula Zoï
IRIS Team, Physiopathologie de la Vision et Motricité Binoculaire, FR3636 Neurosciences Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique University Paris Descartes Paris, France.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 13;10:228. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00228. eCollection 2016.
In a previous experiment, we showed that among young and healthy subjects, thin plantar inserts improve postural control and modify vergence amplitudes. In this experiment, however, significant inter-individual variability was observed. We hypothesize that its origin could be attributed to a different reliance upon feet cutaneous afferents. In order to test this hypothesis, we re-analyzed the data relative to 31 young (age 25.7 ± 3.8) and healthy subjects who participated in the first experiment after having classified them into two groups depending on their Plantar Quotient (PQ = Surface area of CoPfoam/Surface area of CoPfirm ground × 100). Foam decreases the information arising from the feet, normally resulting in a PQ > 100. Hence, the PQ provides information on the weight of plantar cutaneous afferents used in postural control. Twelve people were Plantar-Independent Subjects, as indicated by a PQ < 100. These individuals did not behave like the Normal Plantar Quotient Subjects: they were almost insensitive to the plantar stimulations in terms of postural control and totally insensitive in terms of oculomotor control. We conclude that the inter-individual variability observed in our first experiment is explained by the subjects' degree of plantar reliance. We propose that plantar independence is a dysfunctional situation revealing inefficiency in plantar cutaneous afferents. The latter could be due to a latent somatosensory dysfunction generating a noise which prevents the CNS from correctly processing and using feet somatosensory afferents both for balance and vergence control: Plantar Irritating Stimulus. Considering the non-noxious nature and prevalence of this phenomenon, these results can be of great interest to researchers and clinicians who attempt to trigger postural or oculomotor responses through mechanical stimulation of the foot sole.
在之前的一项实验中,我们发现,在年轻健康的受试者中,薄的足底鞋垫可改善姿势控制并改变聚散幅度。然而,在该实验中,观察到了显著的个体间差异。我们推测其根源可能在于对足部皮肤传入神经的依赖程度不同。为了验证这一假设,我们重新分析了参与首次实验的31名年轻(年龄25.7±3.8岁)健康受试者的数据,根据他们的足底商数(PQ = 泡沫上的中心压力面积/坚实地面上的中心压力面积×100)将他们分为两组。泡沫会减少来自足部的信息,通常会导致PQ>100。因此,PQ提供了姿势控制中使用的足底皮肤传入神经权重的信息。12人是足底独立受试者,其PQ<100。这些个体的行为与正常足底商数受试者不同:他们在姿势控制方面对足底刺激几乎不敏感,在动眼控制方面则完全不敏感。我们得出结论,在我们的首次实验中观察到的个体间差异是由受试者的足底依赖程度所解释的。我们提出,足底独立性是一种功能失调的情况,揭示了足底皮肤传入神经的效率低下。后者可能是由于潜在的体感功能障碍产生了噪声,阻止中枢神经系统正确处理和使用足部体感传入神经进行平衡和聚散控制:足底刺激性刺激。考虑到这种现象的非有害性质和普遍性,这些结果可能会引起试图通过机械刺激脚底来引发姿势或动眼反应的研究人员和临床医生的极大兴趣。