Huang Jing, Gali Himabindu, Paramasivam Manikandan, Muniandy Parameswary, Gichimu Julia, Bellani Marina A, Seidman Michael M
Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health Baltimore, MD, USA.
Front Genet. 2016 May 9;7:84. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00084. eCollection 2016.
DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) block unwinding of the double helix, and have always been regarded as major challenges to replication and transcription. Compounds that form these lesions are very toxic and are frequently used in cancer chemotherapy. We have developed two strategies, both based on immunofluorescence (IF), for studying cellular responses to ICLs. The basis of each is psoralen, a photoactive (by long wave ultraviolet light, UVA) DNA crosslinking agent, to which we have linked an antigen tag. In the one approach, we have taken advantage of DNA fiber and immuno-quantum dot technologies for visualizing the encounter of replication forks with ICLs induced by exposure to UVA lamps. In the other, psoralen ICLs are introduced into nuclei in live cells in regions of interest defined by a UVA laser. The antigen tag can be displayed by conventional IF, as can the recruitment and accumulation of DNA damage response proteins to the laser localized ICLs. However, substantial difference between the technologies creates considerable uncertainty as to whether conclusions from one approach are applicable to those of the other. In this report, we have employed the fiber/quantum dot methodology to determine lesion density and spacing on individual DNA molecules carrying laser localized ICLs. We have performed the same measurements on DNA fibers with ICLs induced by exposure of psoralen to UVA lamps. Remarkably, we find little difference in the adduct distribution on fibers prepared from cells exposed to the different treatment protocols. Furthermore, there is considerable similarity in patterns of replication in the vicinity of the ICLs introduced by the two techniques.
DNA链间交联(ICLs)会阻碍双螺旋的解旋,一直被视为复制和转录的重大挑战。形成这些损伤的化合物具有很强的毒性,常用于癌症化疗。我们基于免疫荧光(IF)开发了两种策略,用于研究细胞对ICLs的反应。每种策略的基础都是补骨脂素,一种光活性(通过长波紫外线,UVA)DNA交联剂,我们已将抗原标签连接到其上。在一种方法中,我们利用了DNA纤维和免疫量子点技术来可视化复制叉与暴露于UVA灯诱导的ICLs的相遇情况。在另一种方法中,补骨脂素ICLs通过UVA激光在活细胞的感兴趣区域引入细胞核。抗原标签可以通过传统的IF显示,DNA损伤反应蛋白向激光定位的ICLs的募集和积累也可以显示。然而,这两种技术之间的实质性差异使得一种方法得出的结论是否适用于另一种方法存在很大的不确定性。在本报告中,我们采用纤维/量子点方法来确定携带激光定位ICLs的单个DNA分子上的损伤密度和间距。我们对用补骨脂素暴露于UVA灯诱导产生ICLs的DNA纤维进行了相同的测量。值得注意的是,我们发现用不同处理方案处理的细胞制备的纤维上的加合物分布几乎没有差异。此外,两种技术引入的ICLs附近的复制模式有相当大的相似性。