Kilgus Stephen P, Kazmerski Jennifer S, Taylor Crystal N, von der Embse Nathaniel P
Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology.
Department of Psychology, East Carolina University.
Sch Psychol Q. 2017 Jun;32(2):240-253. doi: 10.1037/spq0000156. Epub 2016 May 30.
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the utility of Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scale (DBR-SIS) methodology in collecting functional behavior assessment data. Specific questions of interest pertained to the evaluation of the accuracy of brief DBR-SIS ratings of behavioral consequences and determination of the type of training necessary to support such accuracy. Undergraduate student participants (N = 213; 62.0% male; 62.4% White) viewed video clips of students in a classroom setting, and then rated both disruptive behavior and 4 consequences of that behavior (i.e., adult attention, peer attention, escape/avoidance, and access to tangibles/activities). Results indicated training with performance feedback was necessary to support the generation of accurate disruptive behavior and consequence ratings. Participants receiving such support outperformed students in training-only, pretest-posttest, and posttest-only groups for disruptive behavior and all 4 DBR-SIS consequence targets. Future directions for research and implications for practice are discussed, including how teacher ratings may be collected along with other forms of assessment (e.g., progress monitoring) within an efficient Tier 2 assessment model. (PsycINFO Database Record
本调查的目的是评估直接行为评定单项量表(DBR-SIS)方法在收集功能性行为评估数据方面的效用。感兴趣的具体问题涉及对行为后果简短DBR-SIS评定准确性的评估,以及确定支持这种准确性所需的培训类型。本科学生参与者(N = 213;62.0%为男性;62.4%为白人)观看了课堂环境中学生的视频片段,然后对破坏性行为及其该行为的4种后果(即成人关注、同伴关注、逃避/回避以及获得有形物品/活动)进行评分。结果表明,需要有绩效反馈的培训来支持生成准确的破坏性行为和后果评定。在破坏性行为以及所有4个DBR-SIS后果指标方面,接受此类支持的参与者在仅培训组、前测-后测组和仅后测组中表现优于学生。讨论了未来的研究方向和对实践的启示,包括在高效的二级评估模型中如何与其他形式的评估(如进展监测)一起收集教师评定。(PsycINFO数据库记录)