Carney Nancy A, Petroni Gustavo J, Luján Silvia B, Ballarini Nicolás M, Faguaga Gabriela A, du Coudray Hugo E M, Huddleston Amy E, Baggio Gloria M, Becerra Juan M, Busso Leonardo O, Dikmen Sureyya S, Falcone Roberto, García Mirta E, González Carrillo Osvaldo R, Medici Paula L, Quaglino Marta B, Randisi Carina A, Sáenz Silvia S, Temkin Nancy R, Vanella Elida E
1Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 2Centro de Informática e Investigación Clínica, Rosario, Argentina. 3Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina. 4Hospital de Niños Víctor J Vilela, Rosario, Argentina. 5Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, OR. 6Sistema Integrado de Emergencia Sanitaria, Rosario, Argentina. 7Hospital El Cruce, Florencio Varela, Argentina. 8University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 9Hospital Interzonal Especializado Materno Infantil Dr. Vitorio Tetamanti, Mar del Plata, Argentina. 10Hospital de Niños Sor María Ludovica, La Plata, Argentina. 11Hospital de Niños "Dr. Orlando Alassia", Santa Fe, Argentina. 12Hospital de Niños de la Santísima Trinidad, Córdoba, Argentina. 13Hospital Pediátrico Dr. Humberto Notti, Mendoza, Argentina.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;17(7):658-66. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000772.
To develop, in partnership with families of children with traumatic brain injury, a postdischarge intervention that is effective, simple, and sustainable.
Randomized Controlled Trial.
Seven Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Centers in Argentina.
Persons less than 19 years of age admitted to one of the study hospitals with a diagnosis of severe, moderate, or complicated mild traumatic brain injury and were discharged alive.
Patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention or standard care group. A specially trained Community Resource Coordinator was assigned to each family in the intervention group. We hypothesized that children with severe, moderate, and complicated mild traumatic brain injury who received the intervention would have significantly better functional outcomes at 6 months post discharge than those who received standard care. We further hypothesized that there would be a direct correlation between patient outcome and measures of family function.
The primary outcome measure was a composite measured at 6 months post injury. There were 308 patients included in the study (61% men). Forty-four percent sustained a complicated mild traumatic brain injury, 18% moderate, and 38% severe. Sixty-five percent of the patients were 8 years old or younger, and over 70% were transported to the hospital without ambulance assistance. There was no significant difference between groups on the primary outcome measure. There was a statistically significant correlation between the primary outcome measure and the scores on the Family Impact Module of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (ρ = 0.57; p < 0.0001). Children with better outcomes lived with families reporting better function at 6 months post injury.
Although no significant effect of the intervention was demonstrated, this study represents the first conducted in Latin America that documents the complete course of treatment for pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury spanning hospital transport through hospital care and into the postdischarge setting.
与创伤性脑损伤患儿的家庭合作,开发一种出院后有效的、简单且可持续的干预措施。
随机对照试验。
阿根廷的7家一级儿科创伤中心。
年龄小于19岁,因诊断为重度、中度或复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤入住其中一家研究医院且存活出院的患者。
患者被随机分配到干预组或标准护理组。为干预组的每个家庭分配一名经过专门培训的社区资源协调员。我们假设,接受干预的重度、中度和复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤患儿在出院后6个月的功能结局将显著优于接受标准护理的患儿。我们还假设患者结局与家庭功能指标之间存在直接关联。
主要结局指标是伤后6个月时的综合测量值。该研究纳入了308名患者(61%为男性)。44%为复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤,18%为中度,38%为重度。65%的患者年龄在8岁及以下,超过70%的患者在没有救护车协助的情况下被送往医院。两组在主要结局指标上无显著差异。主要结局指标与儿童生活质量量表家庭影响模块的得分之间存在统计学显著相关性(ρ = 0.57;p < 0.0001)。结局较好的儿童所生活的家庭在伤后6个月报告的功能较好。
尽管未证明干预措施有显著效果,但本研究是拉丁美洲首次开展的记录创伤性脑损伤儿科患者从医院转运、住院治疗到出院后整个治疗过程的研究。