• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Semantic prosody and judgment.

作者信息

Hauser David J, Schwarz Norbert

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jul;145(7):882-96. doi: 10.1037/xge0000178. Epub 2016 May 30.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000178
PMID:27243765
Abstract

Some words tend to co-occur exclusively with a positive or negative context in natural language use, even though such valence patterns are not dictated by definitions or are part of the words' core meaning. These words contain semantic prosody, a subtle valenced meaning derived from co-occurrence in language. As language and thought are heavily intertwined, we hypothesized that semantic prosody can affect evaluative inferences about related ambiguous concepts. Participants inferred that an ambiguous medical outcome was more negative when it was caused, a verb with negative semantic prosody, than when it was produced, a synonymous verb with no semantic prosody (Studies 1a, 1b). Participants completed sentence fragments in a manner consistent with semantic prosody (Study 2), and semantic prosody affected various other judgments in line with evaluative inferences (estimates of an event's likelihood in Study 3). Finally, semantic prosody elicited both positive and negative evaluations of outcomes across a large set of semantically prosodic verbs (Study 4). Thus, semantic prosody can exert a strong influence on evaluative judgment. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

相似文献

1
Semantic prosody and judgment.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jul;145(7):882-96. doi: 10.1037/xge0000178. Epub 2016 May 30.
2
Prosodic phrasing in the presence of unambiguous verb information--ERP evidence from German.存在明确动词信息时的韵律短语划分——来自德语的事件相关电位证据
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 29;81:31-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.022. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.用风格使不可预测变得可预测——关于在言语感知中重音感知的韵律预期的关键作用的行为和电生理证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 31;109:181-199. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
The semantics of prosody: acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning.韵律的语义:韵律相关物与词义的声学和感知证据。
Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;33(1):127-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01007.x.
5
Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.语义多样性:一种基于词汇上下文使用变化的语义模糊性度量。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Sep;45(3):718-30. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x.
6
Semantic similarity, predictability, and models of sentence processing.语义相似度、可预测性与句子处理模型。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):267-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.011. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
7
The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.句子理解中句法结构的语义加工:一项事件相关电位研究
Brain Res. 2007 Apr 20;1142:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.030. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
8
The Effect of Non-sentential Context Prosody on Homographs' Lexical Activation in Persian.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Dec;44(6):831-8. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9324-4.
9
Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language.获取与处理动词论元结构:微型语言中的分布学习
Cogn Psychol. 2008 May;56(3):165-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
10
Use of affective prosody by young and older adults.年轻成年人和老年成年人的情感韵律的使用。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Mar;25(1):16-29. doi: 10.1037/a0018777.

引用本文的文献

1
Implicit Bias Reflects the Company That Words Keep.隐性偏见反映了语言所维系的群体。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 13;13:871221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871221. eCollection 2022.