Sedighinejad Abbas, Naderi Nabi Bahram, Haghighi Mohammad, Biazar Gelareh, Imantalab Vali, Rimaz Siamak, Zaridoost Zahra
Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences (GUMS), Rasht, Iran.
Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Apr 2;6(2):e35333. doi: 10.5812/aapm.35333. eCollection 2016 Apr.
Etomidate is a potent hypnotic agent with several desirable advantages such as providing a stable cardiovascular profile with minimal respiratory adverse effects and better hemodynamic stability compared with other induction agents. This drug is associated, however, with myoclonic movements which is characterized by a sudden, brief muscle contractions as a disturbing side-effect.
The present study was designed to compare the effectiveness of low- dose midazolam, magnesium sulfate, remifentanil and low-dose etomidate to suppress etomidate-induced myoclonus in orthopedic surgery.
A double-blind clinical trial study was conducted in an academic hospital from September 2014 to August 2015. Two hundred and eighty-four eligible patients, American society of anesthesiologists class I - II, scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery were randomly allocated into four equal groups (n = 71). They received premedication with intravenous low-dose midazolam 0.015 mg/kg, magnesium sulfate 30 mg/kg, remifentanil 1 μg/kg and low-dose etomidate 0.03 mg/kg two minutes before induction of anesthesia with 0.3 mg/kg intravenous etomidate. Then the incidence and intensity of myoclonus were evaluated on a scale of 0 - 3; 0 = no myoclonus; 1 = mild (movement at wrist); 2 = moderate (movement at arm only, elbow or shoulder); and 3 = severe, generalized response or movement in more than one extremity, within ninety seconds. Any adverse effect due to these premedication agents was recorded.
The incidence and intensity of myoclonus were significantly lower in the low-dose etomidate group. The incidence rates of myoclonus were 51 (71.85%), 61 (85.9%), 30 (42.3%) and 41 (57.7%), and the percentages of patients who experienced grade III of myoclonus were 30 (58.8%), 32 (52.5%), 9 (30%) and 14 (34.1%) in the midazolam, magnesium sulfate, etomidate and remifentanil groups, respectively. The incidence and intensity of myoclonus were significantly lower in the low-dose etomidate group (P = 0.0001). No notable adverse effect was detected in our patients during the study period.
Intravenous etomidate 0.03 mg/kg prior to induction can effectively reduce the incidence and severity of myoclonus linked to etomidate.
依托咪酯是一种强效催眠剂,具有多种理想的优点,例如与其他诱导剂相比,能提供稳定的心血管状况,呼吸副作用最小,血流动力学稳定性更好。然而,这种药物会引发肌阵挛运动,其特征是突然、短暂的肌肉收缩,是一种令人困扰的副作用。
本研究旨在比较低剂量咪达唑仑、硫酸镁、瑞芬太尼和低剂量依托咪酯在骨科手术中抑制依托咪酯诱导的肌阵挛的效果。
2014年9月至2015年8月在一家学术医院进行了一项双盲临床试验研究。284例符合条件的美国麻醉医师协会I - II级择期骨科手术患者被随机分为四组,每组71例。在静脉注射0.3mg/kg依托咪酯诱导麻醉前两分钟,他们分别接受静脉注射低剂量咪达唑仑0.015mg/kg、硫酸镁30mg/kg、瑞芬太尼1μg/kg和低剂量依托咪酯0.03mg/kg的术前用药。然后,在0 - 3级量表上评估肌阵挛的发生率和强度;0 = 无肌阵挛;1 = 轻度(手腕运动);2 = 中度(仅手臂、肘部或肩部运动);3 = 重度,全身反应或一个以上肢体运动,在90秒内。记录这些术前用药引起的任何不良反应。
低剂量依托咪酯组肌阵挛的发生率和强度显著较低。咪达唑仑、硫酸镁、依托咪酯和瑞芬太尼组的肌阵挛发生率分别为51(71.85%)、61(85.9%)、30(4(42.3%)和41(57.7%),经历III级肌阵挛的患者百分比分别为30(58.8%)、32(52.5%)、9(30%)和14(34.1%)。低剂量依托咪酯组肌阵挛的发生率和强度显著较低(P = 0.0001)。在研究期间,我们的患者未检测到明显的不良反应。
诱导前静脉注射0.03mg/kg依托咪酯可有效降低与依托咪酯相关的肌阵挛的发生率和严重程度。