Lemery Steven J, Esteva Francisco J, Weise Martina
From the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; New York University Clinical Cancer Center, New York, NY; Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e151-7. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_155954.
Congress passed the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCI Act) as part of the Affordable Care Act on March 23, 2010. The BPCI Act authorized an approval pathway for biosimilar and interchangeable products. It defines biosimilarity to mean "that the biological product is highly similar to the reference product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components" and that "there are no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency of the product." The biosimilar pathway has the potential to facilitate access to biologic products through increased competition, in the same manner as biosimilars have done for almost 10 years in Europe. The goal of a biosimilar program is not to independently establish safety and effectiveness for each condition of use. Rather, the goal is to demonstrate biosimilarity through an extensive analytical characterization and a targeted clinical program designed to assess for clinically meaningful differences, if they exist. The regulatory approaches in both the United States and Europe involve a totality-of-the-evidence approach to demonstrate biosimilarity. Importantly, the biosimilar pathway allows for extrapolation of data across indications so that a sponsor, with adequate scientific justification, need not conduct clinical studies in each intended condition of use. Without extrapolation, development may not be feasible for many products, and patients and resources could be diverted from clinical studies of newer agents for cancer.
2010年3月23日,美国国会通过了《生物制品价格竞争与创新法案》(BPCI法案),作为《平价医疗法案》的一部分。BPCI法案授权了生物类似药和可互换产品的审批途径。它将生物类似性定义为“尽管生物制品在临床无活性成分上存在细微差异,但与参照产品高度相似”,并且“在产品的安全性、纯度和效力方面,生物制品与参照产品之间不存在临床上有意义的差异”。生物类似药途径有可能通过增加竞争来促进生物制品的可及性,就像生物类似药在欧洲已经推行了近10年那样。生物类似药项目的目标不是为每种使用情况独立确定安全性和有效性。相反,目标是通过广泛的分析表征和旨在评估是否存在临床上有意义差异的针对性临床项目来证明生物类似性。美国和欧洲的监管方法都采用了全面证据法来证明生物类似性。重要的是,生物类似药途径允许跨适应症外推数据,这样申办方在有充分科学依据的情况下,无需在每种预期使用情况下进行临床研究。如果不能外推,许多产品的研发可能不可行,患者和资源可能会从新型癌症药物的临床研究中转移。