Wish Jay B
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Sep 5;9(9):1645-51. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01770214. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
A biosimilar drug or follow-on biologic drug is defined by the Public Health Service Act as a product that is "highly similar to the reference product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically active components and there are no clinically meaningful differences between the biologic product and the reference product in terms of the safety, purity and potency of the product." The advantage of biosimilar drugs is that they are significantly less expensive than the reference products, allowing for increased accessibility and cost savings. Recognizing these advantages, the US Congress passed the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act in 2009 as part of health care reform. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act allows sponsors of biosimilar agents to seek approval by showing structural and functional similarity to the reference agent, with the extent of required clinical studies to be determined on the basis of the degree of biosimilarity with the reference product. The goal is to bring biosimilar agents to the market more efficiently while still protecting the safety of the public. The European Union has had such a process in place for a number of years. Two biosimilar epoetin agents have been approved in the European Union since 2007, and their companies are conducting trials to seek approval in the United States, because Amgen's patent protection for epoetin alfa expires in 2014. Trials completed for European Union approval of both agents showed similar efficacy and safety to the reference epoetin alfa. As with all biologics, immunogenicity concerns may persist because of the fragility of the manufacturing process and the worldwide experience with pure red cell aplasia as a result of epoetin therapy. The uptake of biosimilar epoetins after approval in the United States will depend on the balance of cost advantage against safety concerns. Competition in the marketplace will likely decrease the cost of the reference agent as well.
生物类似药或后续生物制品药物在《公共卫生服务法》中被定义为“与参比产品高度相似,尽管临床活性成分存在细微差异,且该生物制品与参比产品在安全性、纯度和效力方面不存在临床意义上的差异”。生物类似药的优势在于其价格比参比产品低得多,从而提高了可及性并节省了成本。认识到这些优势,美国国会在2009年通过了《生物制品价格竞争与创新法案》,作为医疗保健改革的一部分。《生物制品价格竞争与创新法案》允许生物类似药的申办者通过证明与参比药物在结构和功能上的相似性来寻求批准,所需临床研究的范围将根据与参比产品的生物相似程度来确定。目标是在保护公众安全的同时,更高效地将生物类似药推向市场。欧盟已经实施这样一个程序多年了。自2007年以来,已有两种生物类似的促红细胞生成素药物在欧盟获得批准,其生产公司正在进行试验以寻求在美国获得批准,因为安进公司对促红细胞生成素α的专利保护将于2014年到期。为获得欧盟批准而完成的两种药物的试验表明,它们与参比促红细胞生成素α具有相似的疗效和安全性。与所有生物制品一样,由于生产过程的脆弱性以及促红细胞生成素治疗导致的纯红细胞再生障碍在全球范围内被观察到,免疫原性问题可能依然存在。美国批准后生物类似促红细胞生成素的采用将取决于成本优势与安全担忧之间的平衡。市场竞争也可能会降低参比药物的成本。