Vaishampayan Ulka N
From the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e16-20. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_158977.
Although two phase III trials support the recommendation of nephrectomy followed by interferon alpha in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), this procedure cannot be applied to every patient with this condition. Systemic therapy has changed from interferon alpha to antiangiogenic-targeted therapy, and the clinical impact of nephrectomy in the era of targeted therapy has not been proven. The SEER database shows that only 35% of patients with advanced RCC undergo nephrectomy as their initial treatment. Retrospective studies showed improved overall survival (OS) outcomes with nephrectomy and interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy; however, the inherent selection bias of younger and healthier patients receiving IL-2 likely accounts for this finding. Neoadjuvant therapy has demonstrated only modest efficacy in unresectable disease, and if remission is obtained with systemic therapy, it is unclear whether nephrectomy has any incremental benefit. In the absence of proven benefit of nephrectomy in the setting of targeted therapy, it seems advisable for patients with RCC with severely symptomatic disease, competing comorbidities, poor performance status, or unresectable disease to avoid nephrectomy and proceed directly to systemic therapy. The clinical implications of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy for patients with metastatic RCC are poorly understood, and patient cohorts that do not undergo this procedure are likely to be comprised of patients with unfavorable disease characteristics. Unfortunately, the completed trials of targeted therapy were 90% comprised of patients with prior nephrectomy (the majority of trials incorporate prior nephrectomy as an eligibility requirement) and hence may not reflect the outcomes of the majority of the patients with advanced RCC who have not undergone nephrectomy. Newer therapies such as nivolumab and cabozantinib have also been evaluated for a population in which 90% of the patients underwent nephrectomy. Future clinical trials and registry studies must focus on the therapeutic treatment and overall outcome of patients without nephrectomy and treated with contemporary systemic therapy.
尽管两项III期试验支持转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者先进行肾切除术再接受α干扰素治疗的建议,但该方法并非适用于所有此类患者。全身治疗已从α干扰素转变为抗血管生成靶向治疗,而肾切除术在靶向治疗时代的临床影响尚未得到证实。SEER数据库显示,只有35%的晚期RCC患者将肾切除术作为初始治疗。回顾性研究表明,肾切除术联合白细胞介素-2(IL-2)治疗可改善总生存期(OS);然而,接受IL-2治疗的年轻且健康患者存在的固有选择偏倚可能是这一结果的原因。新辅助治疗在不可切除疾病中仅显示出中等疗效,并且如果通过全身治疗获得缓解,尚不清楚肾切除术是否有任何额外益处。在靶向治疗中肾切除术未被证实有益的情况下,对于有严重症状性疾病、并存合并症、体能状态差或不可切除疾病的RCC患者,避免肾切除术并直接进行全身治疗似乎是明智的。对于转移性RCC患者,延迟性减瘤性肾切除术的临床意义尚不清楚,未接受该手术的患者队列可能由疾病特征不佳的患者组成。不幸的是,已完成的靶向治疗试验90%的患者之前接受过肾切除术(大多数试验将之前接受过肾切除术作为入选标准),因此可能无法反映大多数未接受过肾切除术的晚期RCC患者的结局。诸如纳武单抗和卡博替尼等更新的疗法也针对90%患者接受过肾切除术的人群进行了评估。未来的临床试验和登记研究必须关注未接受肾切除术并接受当代全身治疗的患者的治疗和总体结局。