Rosenbach M L, Cromwell J
Center for Health Economics Research, Needham, MA 02194.
Med Care. 1989 May;27(5):453-65. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198905000-00002.
Nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) are a lower cost substitute for anesthesiologists in the delivery of anesthesia services. This article addresses the question of when anesthesiologists delegate in a team approach as opposed to using a solo arrangement. Logistic regression analysis was done using data from the 1986 Anesthesia Practice Survey and revealed that the team approach is more likely in areas with a relatively large supply of CRNAs; in hospitals with large surgical volumes, teaching facilities, and public hospitals; during emergency procedures, more lengthy procedures, and less complex surgeries; and among patients with poorer preoperative physical status. However, as the supply of anesthesiologists increases, the probability of CRNA use declines and in areas outside New England the "solo anesthesiologist" arrangement is significantly more common. Medicare and other third-party payers should eliminate regional variations in provider mix that are due to locational preferences and provider attitudes. Delegation to CRNAs can be encouraged by reducing what anesthesiologists are paid for practicing alone.
在提供麻醉服务方面,麻醉护士(CRNAs)是麻醉医生成本较低的替代者。本文探讨了麻醉医生何时采用团队协作方式进行授权,而非采用单人操作安排的问题。利用1986年麻醉实践调查的数据进行了逻辑回归分析,结果显示,在麻醉护士供应相对充足的地区;在手术量较大、有教学设施的医院以及公立医院;在急诊手术、手术时间较长以及手术不太复杂的情况下;以及在术前身体状况较差的患者中,采用团队协作方式的可能性更大。然而,随着麻醉医生供应量的增加,使用麻醉护士的可能性会下降,并且在新英格兰以外的地区,“单人麻醉医生”的安排明显更为常见。医疗保险和其他第三方支付方应消除因地理位置偏好和医疗服务提供者态度导致的医疗服务提供者组合的地区差异。通过减少麻醉医生单独执业的报酬,可以鼓励向麻醉护士进行授权。