University of Southern California, 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089-3333. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jun 1;27(6):e195-e200. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88668.
Anesthesiology services are a focal point of policy making to address surprise medical billing. However, allowed amounts and charges for anesthesiology services have been understudied due to the specialty's unique conversion factor (CF) unit of payment and complex provider structures involving anesthesiologists and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). This study compares payments for common outpatient anesthesiology services by commercial health plans, Medicare Advantage (MA), and traditional Medicare.
Analysis of 2016-2017 claims from Health Care Cost Institute.
We derived allowed amount and charge CFs for commercial and MA claims using the base units assigned to each procedure code, time units, and modifiers. We computed the ratio of the allowed amount and charge CFs relative to the traditional Medicare CF. We described these payment measures by provider structure and network status.
Mean in-network commercial allowed amount CFs for anesthesiology services ($70) are 314% of the traditional Medicare rate ($22), whereas mean commercial charge CFs ($148) are 659% of the Medicare rate. Commercial payments vary widely and are higher to anesthesiologists than to CRNAs and higher out of network than in network. MA plan payments align with traditional Medicare with payment parity between anesthesiologists and CRNAs, both in network and out of network.
Common payment measures for anesthesia services-commercial allowed amounts, charges, or traditional Medicare-are highly divergent. MA plans' relatively low payments likely reflect the cost-containing influence of competition with traditional Medicare and MA's prohibition on balance billing. Out-of-network benchmarks for anesthesia services, such as the "qualifying payment amount" used in the No Surprises Act as a guidepost for arbitrators, may benefit from considering commercial payment differences across independent anesthesiologist, independent CRNA, or anesthesiologist-CRNA dyad provider structures.
麻醉服务是解决意外医疗计费政策制定的重点。然而,由于该专业独特的转换系数(CF)支付单位和涉及麻醉师和注册护士麻醉师(CRNA)的复杂提供者结构,麻醉服务的允许金额和收费一直研究不足。本研究比较了商业健康计划、医疗保险优势(MA)和传统医疗保险对常见门诊麻醉服务的支付情况。
对健康成本研究所 2016-2017 年索赔的分析。
我们使用为每个程序代码、时间单位和修饰符分配的基本单位,从商业和 MA 索赔中得出允许的金额和收费 CF。我们计算了允许的金额和收费 CF 与传统医疗保险 CF 的比值。我们根据提供者结构和网络状态描述了这些支付措施。
网络内商业允许的麻醉服务金额 CF(70 美元)是传统医疗保险费率(22 美元)的 314%,而商业收费 CF(148 美元)是医疗保险费率的 659%。商业支付差异很大,对麻醉师的支付高于对 CRNA 的支付,并且在网络外支付高于网络内支付。MA 计划的支付与传统医疗保险一致,在网络内和网络外,麻醉师和 CRNA 之间的支付都具有平价性。
常见的麻醉服务支付措施——商业允许的金额、收费或传统医疗保险——差异很大。MA 计划的相对较低支付可能反映了与传统医疗保险和 MA 禁止平衡计费的竞争的成本控制影响。麻醉服务的网络外基准,例如《无意外法案》中作为仲裁员指南的“合格支付金额”,可能受益于考虑独立麻醉师、独立 CRNA 或麻醉师-CRNA 二元提供者结构的商业支付差异。