相似文献
1
Biology's big funders boost eLife. Open-access journal nets £25 million in support until 2022.
Nature. 2016 Jun 2;534(7605):14-5. doi: 10.1038/534014a.
2
The last bastion of collegiality: the peer-review process in the era of open access.
Int J Dermatol. 2016 Mar;55(3):247-8. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13271.
3
What authors need to know about predatory publishing.
J Forensic Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):1-3. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000064.
4
Caveat Scholar: On the Growth of Predatory Publishing.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017 Winter;37(1):1-2. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000147.
5
Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing?
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7811):167-168. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01520-4.
6
Financing open-access publication after 2024.
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7771):586. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02547-y.
7
Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions.
Nature. 2018 Sep;561(7721):17-18. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06178-7.
8
Open journals that piggyback on arXiv gather momentum.
Nature. 2016 Feb 4;530(7588):117-8. doi: 10.1038/nature.2015.19102.
9
On "Direct to Physician Journal Marketing".
South Med J. 2017 Sep;110(9):604. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000699.
10
Biologists urged to hug a preprint.
Nature. 2016 Feb 18;530(7590):265. doi: 10.1038/530265a.
引用本文的文献
1
Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges.
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;12(2):247-253. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
Zotero 插件