• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学文章的开放获取:益处与挑战综述

Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges.

作者信息

Björk Bo-Christer

机构信息

Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;12(2):247-253. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2
PMID:28101848
Abstract

The Internet has fundamentally changed the publishing of scholarly peer reviewed journals, and the way readers find and access articles. Digital access is nowadays the norm, in particular for researchers. The Internet has enabled a totally new business model, Open Access (OA), in which an article is openly available in full text for anyone with Internet access. This article reviews the different options to achieve this, whether by journals changing their revenue structures from subscription to publishing charges, or authors utilizing a number of options for posting OA versions of article manuscripts in repositories. It also discusses the regrettable emergence of "predatory" publishers, who spam academics, and make money by promising them rapid publication with only the semblance of peer review. The situation is further discussed from the viewpoints of different stakeholders, including academics as authors and readers, practicing physicians and the general public.

摘要

互联网从根本上改变了学术同行评审期刊的出版方式,以及读者查找和获取文章的方式。如今,数字获取已成为常态,尤其是对研究人员而言。互联网催生了一种全新的商业模式——开放获取(OA),即任何能上网的人都可免费获取文章全文。本文回顾了实现这一目标的不同途径,包括期刊将收入结构从订阅制转变为出版收费制,以及作者利用多种方式在知识库中发布文章手稿的开放获取版本。本文还讨论了令人遗憾的“掠夺性”出版商的出现,他们向学者发送垃圾邮件,并通过承诺快速发表文章且仅提供表面的同行评审来盈利。本文从不同利益相关者的角度进一步探讨了这种情况,这些利益相关者包括作为作者和读者的学者、执业医师以及普通公众。

相似文献

1
Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges.科学文章的开放获取:益处与挑战综述
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;12(2):247-253. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
2
A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals.学术开放获取期刊的创新特征研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 16;13(4):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1802.
3
[The different models of scientific journals].[科学期刊的不同模式]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Dec 8;3(4). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.454. eCollection 2023 Dec 31.
4
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009.开放获取科学期刊文献:2009 年状况
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 23;5(6):e11273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273.
6
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
7
How to Recognize and Avoid Potential, Possible, or Probable Predatory Open-Access Publishers, Standalone, and Hijacked Journals.如何识别并避免潜在的、可能的或很可能的掠夺性开放获取出版商、独立期刊及被劫持期刊。
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2016 Nov 1;37(2-3):5-13. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2016-0011.
8
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
9
Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure.开放获取出版的剖析:纵向发展与内部结构研究。
BMC Med. 2012 Oct 22;10:124. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-124.
10
Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005.2005年生物医学领域的开放获取状况。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jan;97(1):4-11. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissemination planning in exercise oncology trials-a systematic review of trial protocols.运动肿瘤学试验中的传播规划——试验方案的系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 15;33(6):473. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09532-4.
2
Disseminating health research to public health policy-makers and practitioners: a survey of source, message content and delivery modality preferences.向公共卫生政策制定者和从业者传播健康研究:对来源、信息内容和传递方式偏好的调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Nov 27;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01066-7.
3
: a new open access journal for anaesthesiology, critical care, and pain medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Biology's big funders boost eLife. Open-access journal nets £25 million in support until 2022.生物学领域的大资助者助力《eLife》。这本开放获取期刊在2022年前获得了2500万英镑的资助。
Nature. 2016 Jun 2;534(7605):14-5. doi: 10.1038/534014a.
2
Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large.科学出版趋势:乌云密布。
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Apr 15;363:119-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.02.040. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
Stop Predatory Publishers Now: Act Collaboratively.立即制止掠夺性出版商:携手合作采取行动。
一本面向麻醉学、重症监护和疼痛医学领域的全新开放获取期刊。
BJA Open. 2022 Jan 17;1:100001. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2021.100001. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Bibliometric analysis and conversion rate of abstracts presented at the Brazilian Congress of Coloproctology into publication of full articles.巴西结直肠外科学会大会上发表的摘要的文献计量分析及其转化为全文发表的转化率。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Jul 10;50:e20233560. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233560-en. eCollection 2023.
5
Factors Affecting the Use of Medical Articles for Citation and Academic Reference.影响医学文章用于引用和学术参考的因素。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Jul 25;13:755-763. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S355465. eCollection 2022.
6
Awareness of predatory journals and open access publishing among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons - results from an online survey in Germany.德国骨科与创伤外科医生对掠夺性期刊及开放获取出版的认知——一项在线调查结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 17;22(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04223-7.
7
Open to the public: paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing.向公众开放:付费墙与开放获取医学研究出版的公共理由。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Feb 28;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y. eCollection 2020.
8
Independent, Publicly Funded Journals Adhering to Platinum Open Access Are the Future of Responsible Scholarly Publishing.坚持白金开放获取的独立、公共资助期刊是负责任学术出版的未来。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Feb 3;35(4):e13. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e13.
9
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools.开放获取出版的综合方法:平台和工具。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 15;34(27):e184. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e184.
10
Current patterns of collaboration in published neurology research: Author collaboration in neurological research.已发表的神经学研究中的当前合作模式:神经学研究中的作者合作
EPMA J. 2017 Mar 22;8(3):207-209. doi: 10.1007/s13167-017-0088-4. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 3;164(9):616-7. doi: 10.7326/M15-3015. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
4
Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.审视美国国立卫生研究院公共获取政策对期刊文章引用率的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 8;10(10):e0139951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139951. eCollection 2015.
5
Half of 2011 papers now free to read.2011年发表的论文中有一半现在可免费阅读。
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):386-7. doi: 10.1038/500386a.
6
Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure.开放获取出版的剖析:纵向发展与内部结构研究。
BMC Med. 2012 Oct 22;10:124. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-124.