Suppr超能文献

《国家儿童研究:简介与历史概述》

The National Children's Study: An Introduction and Historical Overview.

作者信息

Hudak Mark L, Park Christina H, Annett Robert D, Hale Daniel E, McGovern Patricia M, McLaughlin Thomas J, Dole Nancy, Kaar Jill L, Balsam Marion J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida;

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland;

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2016 Jun;137 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S213-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4410B.

Abstract

The National Children's Study (NCS) was an ambitious attempt to map children's health and development in a large representative group of children in the United States. In this introduction, we briefly review the background of the NCS and the history of the multiple strategies that were tested to recruit women and children. Subsequent articles then detail the protocols and outcomes of 4 of the recruitment strategies. It is hoped that lessons learned from these attempts to define a study protocol that could achieve the initial aims of the NCS will inform future efforts to conceptualize and execute strategies to provide generalizable insights on the longitudinal health of our nation's children.

摘要

国家儿童研究(NCS)是一项雄心勃勃的尝试,旨在描绘美国一大群具有代表性儿童的健康与发育状况。在本引言中,我们简要回顾NCS的背景以及为招募妇女和儿童而测试的多种策略的历史。随后的文章详细阐述了其中4种招募策略的方案和结果。希望从这些为确定一项能够实现NCS初始目标的研究方案所做的尝试中吸取的经验教训,能为未来构思和实施相关策略提供参考,以便对我国儿童的纵向健康状况得出可推广的见解。

相似文献

1
The National Children's Study: An Introduction and Historical Overview.
Pediatrics. 2016 Jun;137 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S213-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4410B.
2
The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using the Provider-Based Recruitment Approach.
Pediatrics. 2016 Jun;137 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S239-47. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4410E.
3
Comparison of Recruitment Strategy Outcomes in the National Children's Study.
Pediatrics. 2017 Aug;140(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2822.
4
The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using an Enhanced Household-Based Approach.
Pediatrics. 2016 Jun;137 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S219-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4410C.
5
The National Children's Study: Early Recruitment Outcomes Using the Direct Outreach Approach.
Pediatrics. 2016 Jun;137 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S231-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4410D.
6
The Future of the National Children's Study.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jun;169(6):517-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0364.
7
Public health. NIH puts massive U.S. children's study on hold.
Science. 2014 Jun 20;344(6190):1327. doi: 10.1126/science.344.6190.1327.
9
In the Aftermath of the National Children's Study.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jun;169(6):519-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0272.
10
Epidemiology. Children's study needs pilot testing, panel finds.
Science. 2008 May 30;320(5880):1147. doi: 10.1126/science.320.5880.1147.

引用本文的文献

1
How do 3-year-olds do on the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery?
Child Neuropsychol. 2023 May;29(4):521-542. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2100337. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
2
Meta-analysis under imbalance in measurement of confounders in cohort studies using only summary-level data.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 19;22(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01614-9.
3
Microbiome First Approaches to Rescue Public Health and Reduce Human Suffering.
Biomedicines. 2021 Oct 30;9(11):1581. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111581.
5
Approach to High Volume Enrollment in Clinical Research: Experiences from an All of Us Research Program Site.
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul;13(4):685-692. doi: 10.1111/cts.12759. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Comparison of Recruitment Strategy Outcomes in the National Children's Study.
Pediatrics. 2017 Aug;140(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2822.

本文引用的文献

1
Recruitment of women in the National Children's Study Initial Vanguard Study.
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun 1;179(11):1366-74. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu062. Epub 2014 May 2.
2
Early experiences and predictors of recruitment success for the National Children's Study.
Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;127(2):261-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2334. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
3
National Children's Study: update in 2010.
Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;78(1):119-25. doi: 10.1002/msj.20227.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验