Alonso Maria Beatriz Carrazzone Cal, Vasconcelos Taruska Ventorini, Lopes Luciana Jácome, Watanabe Plauto Christopher Aranha, Freitas Deborah Queiroz
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade de Campinas, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba SP , Brazil, Universidade de Campinas - UNICAMP, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Oral Radiology Area, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, Department of Stomatology, Ribeirão Preto SP , Brazil, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, Department of Stomatology, Public Health and Forensic Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2016 May 31;30(1). doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0073.
This study aimed at evaluating the validity of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for assessing mandibular bone quality using the Klemetti classification. The morphology of the endosteal mandibular cortex of 30 (60 hemi-mandibles) postmenopausal women between the ages of 45 and 80 years was evaluated based on the Klemetti classification in panoramic radiographs used as reference images. Afterwards, panoramic reconstruction and cross-sectional slices of CBCT examinations of these patients were analyzed and categorized according to the same classification. All the images were assessed by two oral radiologists. The McNemar-Bowker test compared the agreement between the CBCT images and the reference images. No differences were found between the diagnostic results based on panoramic radiography and panoramic reconstruction. However, the mean scores for the cross-sectional evaluation were higher, and the results, statistically different from the others. Based on the disagreement found between the panoramic radiographs and the CBCT cross-sectional slices, the Klemetti classification is not an adequate means of assessing bone quality with CBCT. On the other hand, the higher values found for the cross-sectional slices could be associated with better visibility on the CBCT images.
本研究旨在评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)使用克莱梅蒂分类法评估下颌骨质量的有效性。以全景X线片作为参考图像,根据克莱梅蒂分类法对30名年龄在45至80岁之间的绝经后女性(60侧半下颌骨)的下颌骨骨内膜皮质形态进行评估。之后,对这些患者CBCT检查的全景重建图像和横断面图像按照相同分类进行分析和归类。所有图像均由两名口腔放射科医生评估。采用麦克尼马尔-鲍克检验比较CBCT图像与参考图像之间的一致性。基于全景X线摄影和全景重建的诊断结果未发现差异。然而,横断面评估的平均分数更高,且结果与其他结果在统计学上存在差异。基于全景X线片与CBCT横断面图像之间存在的不一致,克莱梅蒂分类法并非用CBCT评估骨质量的合适方法。另一方面,横断面图像的较高分数可能与CBCT图像上更好的可视性有关。